Originally posted by jaywill Nice he's among friends. Everybody needs friends.
But fellow Oxford Atheist calls Dawkins a coward because he won't debate William Lane Craig.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC1xgS1XGSg
Calling Richard Dawkins a coward for refusing to debate William Craig Lane would be like calling a professional boxer a coward for refusing to fight in a bar brawl.
Originally posted by Agerg Calling Richard Dawkins a coward for refusing to debate William Craig Lane would be like calling a professional boxer a coward for refusing to fight in a bar brawl.
Originally posted by RJHinds What does that mean? He wants money?
No...it means there is nothing that should motivate Dawkins to waste his time with this Lane feller. To put it another way, strip away his elegantly worded sophistries and it would be like calling any of the numerous scientists, mathematicians, philosophers, etc... on these boards cowards for refusing to debate the likes of Dasa, or RBHILL, or...YOU!
Originally posted by Agerg No...it means there is nothing that should motivate Dawkins to waste his time with this Lane feller. To put it another way, strip away his elegantly worded sophistries and it would be like calling any of the numerous scientists, mathematicians, philosophers, etc... on these boards cowards for refusing to debate the likes of Dasa, or RBHILL, or...YOU!
That's funny. You think too highly of this Dawkins character.
Originally posted by VoidSpirit gasp! he won't debate bill "god of the gaps" craig?
hitchens already defeated craig's argument. no need to double-team the poor feller.
Originally posted by sonhouse Sounds like you haven't wasted your time finding out who he is, eh.
Do you know who Bill Maher is?
Yes, He is a want-to-be comedian on the HBO channel.
I think the show is called Realtime. He also tries to talk
politics, which he knows very little and then tries to be
funny by making some crude jokes that misrepresent
the truth. However, he has a very liberal audience that
eat it all up like he is some type of god.
Originally posted by VoidSpirit hehe. another theist who defeats his own argument.
"you're postulating something as complex as a human brain to explain two scratches."
turn this logic around:
"you're postulating something as complex as a god to explain some scratches in the cosmos."
I suppose you would agree with Dawkins idea on morality
that there is no such think as good and evil, whatever happens
just happens, it is no ones fault.
Richard Dawkins among friends, Bill Maher:
18 Aug '11 08:39
YouTube
Back to Top