Go back
Richard Dawkins among friends, Bill Maher:

Richard Dawkins among friends, Bill Maher:

Spirituality

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

&NR=1

Its nice to see him among friends for a change.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fUYUvvJiW0&NR=1

Its nice to see him among friends for a change.
Nice he's among friends. Everybody needs friends.

But fellow Oxford Atheist calls Dawkins a coward because he won't debate William Lane Craig.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fUYUvvJiW0&NR=1

Its nice to see him among friends for a change.
Bill Maher is just as much a liar as Dawkins so they certainly
go together.

Clock
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jaywill
Nice he's among friends. Everybody needs friends.

But fellow Oxford Atheist calls Dawkins a coward because he won't debate William Lane Craig.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC1xgS1XGSg
Calling Richard Dawkins a coward for refusing to debate William Craig Lane would be like calling a professional boxer a coward for refusing to fight in a bar brawl.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
Calling Richard Dawkins a coward for refusing to debate William Craig Lane would be like calling a professional boxer a coward for refusing to fight in a bar brawl.
What does that mean? He wants money?

Clock
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
What does that mean? He wants money?
No...it means there is nothing that should motivate Dawkins to waste his time with this Lane feller. To put it another way, strip away his elegantly worded sophistries and it would be like calling any of the numerous scientists, mathematicians, philosophers, etc... on these boards cowards for refusing to debate the likes of Dasa, or RBHILL, or...YOU!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Agerg
No...it means there is nothing that should motivate Dawkins to waste his time with this Lane feller. To put it another way, strip away his elegantly worded sophistries and it would be like calling any of the numerous scientists, mathematicians, philosophers, etc... on these boards cowards for refusing to debate the likes of Dasa, or RBHILL, or...YOU!
That's funny. You think too highly of this Dawkins character.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jaywill
Nice he's among friends. Everybody needs friends.

But fellow Oxford Atheist calls Dawkins a coward because he won't debate William Lane Craig.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC1xgS1XGSg
gasp! he won't debate bill "god of the gaps" craig?
hitchens already defeated craig's argument. no need to double-team the poor feller.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
gasp! he won't debate bill "god of the gaps" craig?
hitchens already defeated craig's argument. no need to double-team the poor feller.
Well I see we are all united finally😉

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
That's funny. You think too highly of this Dawkins character.
Sounds like you haven't wasted your time finding out who he is, eh.
Do you know who Bill Maher is?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Dawkins among good friends - a mathmatician who comments on "The God Delusion"

&feature=related

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jaywill
Dawkins among good friends - a mathmatician who comments on "The God Delusion"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY1uTlaP2Pc&feature=related
hehe. another theist who defeats his own argument.

"you're postulating something as complex as a human brain to explain two scratches."

turn this logic around:

"you're postulating something as complex as a god to explain some scratches in the cosmos."

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Bill Maher = Douche King LOL 😉






Manny

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
Sounds like you haven't wasted your time finding out who he is, eh.
Do you know who Bill Maher is?
Yes, He is a want-to-be comedian on the HBO channel.
I think the show is called Realtime. He also tries to talk
politics, which he knows very little and then tries to be
funny by making some crude jokes that misrepresent
the truth. However, he has a very liberal audience that
eat it all up like he is some type of god.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
hehe. another theist who defeats his own argument.

"you're postulating something as complex as a human brain to explain two scratches."

turn this logic around:

"you're postulating something as complex as a god to explain some scratches in the cosmos."
I suppose you would agree with Dawkins idea on morality
that there is no such think as good and evil, whatever happens
just happens, it is no ones fault.

&NR=1

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.