Originally posted by KeplerYes, and believing in millions of years and a century with no sun is a good example of one with blind faith and blind stupidity. A person who puts his faith in the evil-lutionists has put his head up his arse so he can no longer see the truth of the proof of a devine creator that is plainly visible to all that will look around.
Blind faith and blind stupidity in one efficient package.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat does the age of the earth and the physical effects of a comet striking the earth have to do with evolution? I think you have the cart before the horse here. The evidence confirms the incredible age of the earth but that doesn't come from evolution. I will say it clearly in the faint hope that you can understand. Evolution is NOT evidence for the age of the earth, the methods I quoted elsewhere are evidence for the age of the earth. Evidence, not belief.
Yes, and believing in millions of years and a century with no sun is a good example of one with blind faith and blind stupidity. A person who puts his faith in the evil-lutionists has put his head up his arse so he can no longer see the truth of the proof of a devine creator that is plainly visible to all that will look around.
Care to extract your cranium from your hindquarters and make an effort at understanding what is written rather than what you assume is written?
1 edit
Originally posted by KeplerThe evilutionists need these long periods of time to give their theory some chance of fooling people into believing it might be possible. Exaggerating these ages is there attempt to support the theory they wish to believe in. The atheist evil-lutionists accuse the creationist scientists of doing the reverse to support their creationist theory.
What does the age of the earth and the physical effects of a comet striking the earth have to do with evolution? I think you have the cart before the horse here. The evidence confirms the incredible age of the earth but that doesn't come from evolution. I will say it clearly in the faint hope that you can understand. Evolution is NOT evidence for the age of t ...[text shortened]... ers and make an effort at understanding what is written rather than what you assume is written?
The truth is that there is no factual evidence that proves the earth is older than a few thousand years. The factual evidence can only support an earth of a few thousand years, with a maximum of about 10,000 years, but that is not acceptable by the evilution crowd, who need billions of years at least for their theory to even have a slight possibility. They don't understand that no amount of time will cause something to be created out of nothing, especially in some orderly manner that obey certain laws that did not exist in the first place.
Originally posted by RJHindsStill got your head up your bum then.
The evilutionists need these long periods of time to give their theory some chance of fooling people into believing it might be possible. Exaggerating these ages is there attempt to support the theory they wish to believe in. The atheist evil-lutionists accuse the creationist scientists of doing the reverse to support their creationist theory.
The truth ...[text shortened]... especially in some orderly manner that obey certain laws that did not exist in the first place.
Creationist scientist, now there's a contradiction in terms.
Originally posted by wolfgang59There are Asian "dragons" which are typically about 6 foot long.
"we" ?
What are these donosaur-like lizards?
Crocodiles are probably related (but not descended from) dinosaurs and
surely you are not refering to birds RJ? That would make you an evolutionist!
Mind you just because he is right about the dinosaur-like lizards doesn't mean that the rest of his post has any merit with connecting the past to the now.
Originally posted by RJHindsActually there is plenty of evidence that says the Earth is many millions of years old. Why you think this is an evolutionist conspiracy is beyond me.
The evilutionists need these long periods of time to give their theory some chance of fooling people into believing it might be possible. Exaggerating these ages is there attempt to support the theory they wish to believe in. The atheist evil-lutionists accuse the creationist scientists of doing the reverse to support their creationist theory.
The truth ...[text shortened]... especially in some orderly manner that obey certain laws that did not exist in the first place.
Are you having trouble accepting that other branches of science like geology and chemistry have come up with a way older Earth than 6000 years? These (and other) scientific disciplines have shown an Earth that is way more consistent with evolutionary theory than young Earth creationism , but heck, that's just common sense to a great number of people.
Indeed you say that we need only look at the Earth to see the evidence of a creator and a young Earth, but when I do look - either just by looking at mountains and other geological formations, or by reading various scientific books - I can never fathom how anyone could think that that is a mere 6000 years.
Did you ever consider an older Earth creationist model? This would certainly lend your ideas a heap more credibility.
Originally posted by RJHindsHow many times do I have to tell you that God has more tools in His toolbox than just a hammer, and that His creation is more than just a bunch of nails? If God is indeed omnipotent, what makes you think it is logical to limit His creation to only those things He can create "with His voice", i.e. speaking them into existence?
Yes, and believing in millions of years and a century with no sun is a good example of one with blind faith and blind stupidity. A person who puts his faith in the evil-lutionists has put his head up his arse so he can no longer see the truth of the proof of a devine creator that is plainly visible to all that will look around.
I'm telling you that there are more ways to create than just waving a magic wand. All the properties of physics are His tools. What is time to God? Why limit God to just what is reasonable *to you*? You can't even give God the benefit of the doubt? Why must you put your 'rules' on God?
I know there is a divine Creator. I just don't limit Him and make up some human-conceived rules about how He can go about His business.
Originally posted by SuzianneI did not make the rules up. They are written in the Holy Bible. 😏
How many times do I have to tell you that God has more tools in His toolbox than just a hammer, and that His creation is more than just a bunch of nails? If God is indeed omnipotent, what makes you think it is logical to limit His creation to only those things He can create "with His voice", i.e. speaking them into existence?
I'm telling you that there ...[text shortened]... limit Him and make up some human-conceived rules about how He can go about His business.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!
Originally posted by RJHindsIf we took you up in orbit with a time machine that could watch each year into the past unfold every second for a full day and land and find yourself 86,000 years in the past with only Neandertals and Cromags around and zero in the way of buildings or books or any of that, you would still deny deny deny and probably go nuts trying to rationalize it in your head that Earth is actually billions of years old.
I did not make the rules up. They are written in the Holy Bible. 😏
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!
I would love to be there to see that.
Originally posted by sonhousePerhaps you have already gone nuts trying to rationalize in your head that the Earth is billions of years old rather than the thousands that can be proved rationally.
If we took you up in orbit with a time machine that could watch each year into the past unfold every second for a full day and land and find yourself 86,000 years in the past with only Neandertals and Cromags around and zero in the way of buildings or books or any of that, you would still deny deny deny and probably go nuts trying to rationalize it in your head that Earth is actually billions of years old.
I would love to be there to see that.
😏