Originally posted by sonhouse Perhaps it is because 4 billion years have passed, giving plenty of time to cool down from millions of impacts. Your cognitive dissonance is showing BIGTIME.
YouOriginally posted by RJHinds What happened to the moon dust?
The Instructor
Your desperation is showing. There is plenty of moon dust but it doesn't seem to be as deep as people thought back in the 1920's which is apparently where you got your data.
Originally posted by sonhouse Your desperation is showing. There is plenty of moon dust but it doesn't seem to be as deep as people thought back in the 1920's which is apparently where you got your data.
Wouldn't that mean it is not as old as they thought too?
Originally posted by menace71 http://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2005/04/671
Manny
We don't need to study the moon dust anyway. We have no need to be on the moon. God did not make it for habitation. God made it for signs and for seasons and for days and years and to give light at night on the earth.
Originally posted by RJHinds We don't need to study the moon dust anyway. We have no need to be on the moon. God did not make it for habitation. God made it for signs and for seasons and for days and years and to give light at night on the earth.
The Instructor
Why did he put water on the moon then? We can make rocket fuel out of water by solar power, have drinking water and with electrolysis we get oxygen and hydrogen, a great fuel for fuel cells and rockets. Why would your so-called lord entice us with that since it can be the basis for a civilization on the moon?and plentiful solar energy since you almost always get the full 126 watts per square foot or 1355 watts per square meter available there?
And you tell me where in your precious bible does it say we cannot go to other planets like Mars or Europa or the Moon?
We DO have a reason for being on the moon. If the big asteroid hits that destroyed the dinosaurs for the most part even though they were dying anyway, that asteroid did the coup de grace on them at least. If we have colonies on the moon self sustaining or Mars or Europa or Titan, wherever we can establish self sustaining colonies, if the big one hits Earth and wipes out all humans there, by our own petards we survive as a race instead of being confined to this one prison planet where we are at the mercy of the indifferent universe.
Originally posted by RJHinds We don't need to study the moon dust anyway. We have no need to be on the moon. God did not make it for habitation. God made it for signs and for seasons and for days and years and to give light at night on the earth.
The Instructor
Originally posted by caissad4 Didn't sonhouse just answer that question ??
Look back a few posts and read , please. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Old sonhouse is talking out his arse. Even a moron should know that is impractical. It would cost us more time, effort, and expense than any benefit we could possibly get from it. It would be a sure way for the liberals to bankrupt us.
Originally posted by RJHinds Old sonhouse is talking out his arse. Even a moron should know that is impractical. It would cost us more time, effort, and expense than any benefit we could possibly get from it. It would be a sure way for the liberals to bankrupt us.
The instructor
Pray tell, which orifice have you been speaking out of lately ??🙄🙄🙄🙄
Originally posted by RJHinds I have a mouth that I always use for speaking. That is the intelligent way.
The instructor
But you have to take off your pants to speak. It must be difficult to talk when fully dressed. I guess you have to turn around and bend over to talk loud enough to be heard. The hard part must be when you take a crap through your mouth.
Originally posted by sonhouse But you have to take off your pants to speak. It must be difficult to talk when fully dressed. I guess you have to turn around and bend over to talk loud enough to be heard. The hard part must be when you take a crap through your mouth.
28 May '13 18:48
YouTube
RJH as an instructor?
Back to Top