15 Dec 12
Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
How do you know?
actual I am nowhere near tying myself in knots, but thanks for proving that you are
merely being contentious for contentiousness sake. My statements are both clear and
succinct, if you wish to simply assume values and assign them to others and base
fictional arguments upon those assumptions then that's up to you. I have therefore the
sad announcement that you will now also be placed on ignore as a time waster until
such times as you are deemed to be worthy of my precious time, goodbye dear Agers,
wish you well.
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by Agerg[/b]That's all well and good, but how do you know if you made the list?, goodbye dear Agers,
actual I am nowhere near tying myself in knots, but thanks for proving that you are
merely being contentious for contentiousness sake. My statements are both clear and
succinct, if you wish to simply assume values and assign them to others and base
fictional arguments upon those assumptions then that's up to you. [b]I have therefore the
sad announ ...[text shortened]... ou are deemed to be worthy of my precious time
wish you well.
15 Dec 12
4 edits
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneBecause there is a set of people Robbie Carrobie claims he has on ignore which I refer to as a list. Having been told by Robbie Carrobie I now qualify for membership in that set I also qualify for being in that list (since Robbie's Ignore list is synonymous with the set of people he is currently ignoring).
That's all well and good, but how do you know if you made the list?
Therefore I conclude I made the list. (You might be interpreting that "I made the list" means I constructed the list - this would be an incorrect interpretation)
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn fact, it would seem you are pretending to ignore Agerg's posts because he caught you in a lie, here Thread 150191 page 22 onwards.
I can't see his text ... Agers made it for being a time waster.
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by FMFYou make it sound like Robbie is sitting in the control room of
There have been a few instances where a response from robbie clearly indicated that he was only pretending to ignore posts using software. His explanation was that he was NOT ignoring posts on ALL his computers as he had not installed the software on all of them. 😵
Stargate Command or 24.
Really you lot should stop playing silly beggars.
There are quite a few nut cases on here that I would not
have much time for but IGNORE LISTS?????
You are acting like children in a school yard.
Are you not grown men who can argue and debate like gentlemen?
🙄
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by johnnylongwoodythey are scoundrels johnny, cads and bounders, guilty of skulduggery and sleaze
You make it sound like Robbie is sitting in the control room of
Stargate Command or 24.
Really you lot should stop playing silly beggars.
There are quite a few nut cases on here that I would not
have much time for but IGNORE LISTS?????
You are acting like children in a school yard.
Are you not grown men who can argue and debate like gentlemen?
🙄
tactics.
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by johnnylongwoodyI can and often do debate like a gentleman, but if someone wants to throw tantrums in response to being called out on a contradiction I'm more than prepared to "grow-down" a little ;]
You make it sound like Robbie is sitting in the control room of
Stargate Command or 24.
Really you lot should stop playing silly beggars.
There are quite a few nut cases on here that I would not
have much time for but IGNORE LISTS?????
You are acting like children in a school yard.
Are you not grown men who can argue and debate like gentlemen?
🙄
15 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by johnnylongwoodyIt seems there are some who claim to use software to block the posts of people who make arguments that they do not like or disagree with in debates. I don't know what your "grown men" litmus test makes of that. 😀
Are you not grown men who can argue and debate like gentlemen?