Go back
Robbie's Ignore List

Robbie's Ignore List

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
I don't agree but that's my thought and the best I have.
Whether you agree or not is immaterial. robbie posted what he posted. He was caught out over whether he'd read your abusive and threatening PM too. It's all in the public domain.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Whether you agree or not is immaterial. robbie posted what he posted. He was caught out over whether he'd read your abusive and threatening PM too. It's all in the public domain.
Ok. It's not my issue so I have nothing else to say.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Ok. It's not my issue so I have nothing else to say.
What was the moderator's response to your accusations of "stalking" and "harassment"? It's been nearly two weeks since you tried to get me banned from the site. Have they upheld your complaint?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
He has also claimed that he uses software to obscure the texts from those 'on ignore' so it can't be read.
There is a way to do this with browser add-ons. I played around with it at another forum a few years back with a Firefox add-on and it worked reasonably well against a dingus who was probably an order of magnitude more noisome than Dasa and that hallelujah clod put together.


Originally posted by galveston75
Ok. It's not my issue so I have nothing else to say.
LOL, these people actually believe their own propaganda, hilarious.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, these people actually believe their own propaganda, hilarious.
A thought I have every time I encounter someone who thinks the Earth is a few thousand years old, or that god exists, or that there is an afterlife...

Except I don't think it's funny.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
On the thread about the 27 people shot dead, including 22 children, galveston75 suddenly submitted a lengthy seemingly incongruous post - it's not really clear why - it seemed to be about himself being some kind of a victim of something, but refused to discuss it. Very odd. Maybe it was not incongruous to him. Maybe he thought his ruminations about himself belonged on that thread.

edit: oh I now see, having raised himself as an issue on that thread, he has refused to explain why to you too.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
On the thread about the 27 people shot dead, including 22 children, galveston75 suddenly submitted a lengthy seemingly incongruous post - it's not really clear why - it seemed to be about himself being some kind of a victim of something, but refused to discuss it. Very odd. Maybe it was not incongruous to him. Maybe he thought his ruminations about himself belo ...[text shortened]... ee, having raised himself as an issue on that thread, he has refused to explain why to you too.
Actually I started it by posting to say that G75 had made a good sound argument on the
topic of gun control, which indicated that he was capable of making and understanding such
arguments, and that this fact threw some of his other posts into a worse light.

He then responded to that.

However he is right and that is not the thread to really discuss this.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Soothfast
There is a way to do this with browser add-ons. I played around with it at another forum a few years back with a Firefox add-on and it worked reasonably well against a dingus who was probably an order of magnitude more noisome than Dasa and that hallelujah clod put together.
Yes I know. But it seems robbie is only pretending. Proper Knob called him on it once or twice. robbie had some contorted excuse about why he has the ability to see only those of my posts he needs to see, or something; maybe he can explain it. It had something to do with only having the browser add-on installed on some of his computers, not all of them, or whatever. What's odd is that he keeps referring to me in his posts while bleating about not reading any of my responses. You'd think if he was professing to ignore me, he wouldn't write about me in what seems like every other post, right?


Originally posted by googlefudge
Actually I started it by posting to say that G75 had made a good sound argument on the
topic of gun control, which indicated that he was capable of making and understanding such
arguments, and that this fact threw some of his other posts into a worse light.

He then responded to that.

However he is right and that is not the thread to really discuss this.
On another thread he has cut and pasted 4 or 5 or 6 times in a row "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering" in lieu of actually answering questions about what he had claimed, and yet later he himself brings up the "stupid bickering" thing on a thread about 27 people being murdered. He's allowed NOT to drop the subject, apparently, but others get the copy paste thing when they don't drop it. All very odd if you ask me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
On another thread he has cut and pasted 4 or 5 or 6 times in a row "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bickering", "My 'request' is to move on and drop this stupid bick ...[text shortened]... opy paste thing when they don't drop it. All very odd if you ask me.
Oh I have no issues with you (or anyone else) keeping pressing him on his hypocrisy.

I just don't think that particular thread is the right place to do so.

And I was pointing out that he didn't bring up the subject in that thread out of the blue.
he was prompted, by me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
I just don't think that particular thread is the right place to do so.
If you look - page 6 - it was me who tried to gently steer him away from making any further self-pitying posts. And it would seem I succeeded.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
this is the type of sleaze that i meant, Agers did nothing of the sort, he failed to discern
that i was making reference to alert the moderators on behalf of someone else and did
not alert them on my own behalf. Insinuations of lying are rife from FMF, its what he
does. He was caught stalking and harassing a user, the user stated that he was n ...[text shortened]... s, so FMF ignored him and
harassed him anyway. He was reported to the moderators for doing so.
Remind me again , when was he caugh harassing and stalking a user. There was no insinution of lying. You were caugh red handed lying. It was your own words and noone else that showed you to lying

Vote Up
Vote Down

Maybe be nice and Rob will unignore you.😕