Originally posted by @rajk999A forum spambot perhaps?
Correvt ... you have my support. The man is the most annoying spammer i have seen in over 14 yrs.
Any human spammer would have scurried away by now with his tail between his legs, surely? The repetitive vitriol and mind-numbing juvenility he churns out is virtually automatic.
Originally posted by @romans1009On question, and one question only: why?
Glad to see you’re joining the hatefest, amigo. No one hates like you - hate usually spews out of you in here like a geyser.
Show LittlePup how it’s done!
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke<<Any human spammer would have scurried away by now with his tail between his legs, surely?>>
A forum spambot perhaps?
Any human spammer would have scurried away by now with his tail between his legs, surely? The repetitive vitriol and mind-numbing juvenility he churns out is virtually automatic.
Only if they care what atheists think, hombre. And maybe not even then. The trolling by atheists in here is so juvenile and lowrent, it’s hard to feel anything but embarrassment when one encounters it - but that goes for your posts on substance too, Mr. “Books of the Bible were written decades apart.”
I think a thread ought to be created with all the basic theological errors you’ve made - that’d be the most active thread on here!
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemJust FYI:
I can't recall, in recent memory, a proponent "" (as such) so easily p{ssed on, as Romans 1009. He is, at best, a proper receptacle for defecation by all Spirituality Forum members, regardless of persuation?!!! Am I wrong?
In addition to LittleMutt, PoodleBoy and LittlePup, you have been given the Native American moniker, “Flaming Cheeks of Embarrassment.”
As far as I know, you are the only SF poster with four(!) monikers.
Wow!
Originally posted by @dj2beckertiger has been quite the hypocrite lately. And his posting lately has been scattershot and unhinged. I hope everything’s Ok at the pub.
Playing the ball again I see. 😴
Originally posted by @romans1009Not four monikers! Whatever will I do? 🙄
Just FYI:
In addition to LittleMutt, PoodleBoy and LittlePup, you have been given the Native American moniker, “Flaming Cheeks of Embarrassment.”
As far as I know, you are the only SF poster with four(!) monikers.
Wow!
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemI’m glad to see you’ve calmed down and are no longer cursing and blowing your stack in shame and embarrassment.
Not four monikers! Whatever will I do? 🙄
Nice!
Originally posted by @romans1009Fvck off, troll.
I’m glad to see you’ve calmed down and are no longer cursing and blowing your stack in shame and embarrassment.
Nice!
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemWell your calmness didn’t last long, Flaming Cheeks of Embarrassment.
Fvck off, troll.
Originally posted by @romans1009Seriously, man, you're not doing yourself any favors here, keeping up with this "comedy routine".
BTW, Heartpence is now known as “hombre.”
Didn’t want there to be confusion.
tiger, Kiddo and amigo retain their rightful names.
You know, calling people "nicknames" works for Trump only because no one expects anything approaching intelligence from him. By following his lead, you're only hurting yourself.
Originally posted by @suzianneI think you’re just angry I don’t have a nickname for you.
Seriously, man, you're not doing yourself any favors here, keeping up with this "comedy routine".
You know, calling people "nicknames" works for Trump only because no one expects anything approaching intelligence from him. By following his lead, you're only hurting yourself.
Little do you know, you’re Miss Alawat, tiger’s homeroom teacher and first crush and bane of Heartpence (now hombre) because he overheard you call him a “crazy nutjob” outside the teacher’s lounge at Shetland Primary.
Though Heartpence is now known as hombre, he retains his status as Shetland Primary’s guidance counselor who fancies himself a world-class psychiatrist.
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemI am thinking 1009 is that kid who liked to get drunk fight with dive and threaten to take off his gloves.
I can't recall, in recent memory, a proponent "" (as such) so easily p{ssed on, as Romans 1009. He is, at best, a proper receptacle for defecation by all Spirituality Forum members, regardless of persuation?!!! Am I wrong?
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemThere's nothing so wrong with romans that's not wrong with any of us to one degree or another.
I can't recall, in recent memory, a proponent "" (as such) so easily p{ssed on, as Romans 1009. He is, at best, a proper receptacle for defecation by all Spirituality Forum members, regardless of persuation?!!! Am I wrong?
There are worse posters in this forum.