-Removed-I don't think that's true. People can inspire many outside of their narrow denomination. You didn't have to be a Hindu to be inspired by Gandhi. Or a Buddhist to be inspired by the Dalai Lama. A man of insight will transcend the narrow confines of his denomination and inspire those not otherwise inclined to agree with him.
Originally posted by RJHindsSays you.
He's rich, but there are people worth billions that are listened to less. I think he is rich because people care what he says, not because of how much money he has.
I say that the people with the billions are telling those in the federal government what to do as where Rush just gripes about it.
Originally posted by whodeyHa, ha, okay, have it your way. I'm listening anyway. I can't ignore a brain on loan from God, even though half of it is tied behind his back.
Says you.
I say that the people with the billions are telling those in the federal government what to do as where Rush just gripes about it.
-Removed-This is not true. He was chosen by Time Magazine as "Person-of-the-Year". I doubt this means that no one cares about what he says, thinks or does. Many people have been watching this new pope (including me) precisely because he's simply not the same as the old popes. With any luck, he'll be successful in proving that the RC Church can finally be seen as 'for the people'. I have great hope for the Church under this pope.
Originally posted by RJHindsAre you somehow 'defending' him? When will the majority of conservatives (who are not rich, by any means) figure out that most high-profile conservatives are leading them down the primrose path so they can continue to get them to support their own, anti-American agendas? Wake up, Ron, and see that the ideal America for these conservatives does not include you.
Not that rich. His net worth is less than $400 million.
