1. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    09 Mar '05 01:05
    Originally posted by pcaspian


    As RHP actually hosts his information, should they do nothing to protect a users intelectual property, indeed they can be liable.
    This is nonsense. Read the ToS. RHP has no such obligation.
  2. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48439
    09 Mar '05 01:061 edit
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    One man's tough is another man's amusement. I'd stick around if I could.
    Sure you are amusing yourself. As usual at the expense of others, just like in the good old pre-ban times, Cribs. You were a shit stirrer then and you still are one now.
  3. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    09 Mar '05 01:082 edits
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    If Ivanhoe believes his little tantrum is "intellectual property" (I would say it's neither; nevermind both), he can take the following steps according to the TOS:

    If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that ...[text shortened]... e been on this "banning" kick for a few days. Hop to it, Ratboy!
    I hate to tell you, no1, but your analysis only applies to copyrighted material ripped from somewhere else and posted into the RHP forums, not the other way around.

    RHP has no obligation to protect Ivanhoe's material that he creates here.
  4. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48439
    09 Mar '05 01:11

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  5. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    09 Mar '05 01:13
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    I hate to tell you, no1, but your analysis only applies to copyrighted material ripped from somewhere else and posted into the RHP forums, not the other way around.

    RHP has no obligation to protect Ivanhoe's material that he creates here.
    Well it doesn't specifically say that, but that's because material posted here is not copyrighted or intellectual property. But if Ivanhoe and his attorney Pcaspian want to make such an absurd claim, that's the procedure they would have to follow. Know what I'm saying?
  6. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    09 Mar '05 01:162 edits
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Well it doesn't specifically say that
    But it does:

    "A description of where the material that you claim is infringing [not infringed] is located on the site; "

    The procedure they would have to follow would be a similar one, but directed toward the FW administrator, who would likely ignore it or post it for public ridicule.

    The portion of the ToS that you cited could have been duly invoked during the Exposure incident, when Ivanhoe posted material from FW here without the permission of those FW users.
  7. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    09 Mar '05 01:20
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    But it does:

    "A description of where the material that you claim is infringing [not infringed] is located on the site; "

    The procedure they would have to follow would be a similar one, but directed toward the FW administrator, who would likely ignore it or post it for public ridicule.

    The portion of the ToS that you cited cou ...[text shortened]... incident, when Ivanhoe posted material from FW here without the permission of those FW users.
    HMMMM, missed that. Perhaps he can include his claim of "infringment on the intellectual property of my tantrum and/or raving" in with his request for mass bannings in his PM to Russ.
  8. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    09 Mar '05 01:211 edit
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Perhaps he can include his claim of "infringment on the intellectual property of my tantrum and/or raving" in with his request for mass bannings in his PM to Russ.
    He may as well.
  9. Graceland.
    Joined
    02 Dec '02
    Moves
    18130
    09 Mar '05 01:22

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  10. Standard memberDarfius
    The Apologist
    Joined
    22 Dec '04
    Moves
    41484
    09 Mar '05 01:23

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  11. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    09 Mar '05 01:27
    Originally posted by Darfius
    I just had my world turned upside down.
    You should use your own judgment to evaluate those claims before accepting them as truths.
  12. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    09 Mar '05 01:302 edits

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  13. Standard membertelerion
    True X X Xian
    The Lord's Army
    Joined
    18 Jul '04
    Moves
    8353
    09 Mar '05 01:31
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    You should use your own judgment to evaluate those claims before accepting them as truths.
    If pcaspian said it, then it's good enough for me. I don't even have do to a google search.

  14. Graceland.
    Joined
    02 Dec '02
    Moves
    18130
    09 Mar '05 01:371 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  15. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    09 Mar '05 01:37

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree