Go back
Scientists have the ability to be wrong:

Scientists have the ability to be wrong:

Spirituality


Modern Human NOT from Africa



Debunked "Scientists" are Wrong Again, we are not out of Africa

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Modern Human NOT from Africa

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpsKbyyI7iE

Debunked "Scientists" are Wrong Again, we are not out of Africa

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f4rhQuTRhQ
You already posted that already refuted BS tale. It said Neandertals mated with people who came out of Africa, but didn't go back. You are a bit on the dim side, you need to refill your meds.


Originally posted by sonhouse
You already posted that already refuted BS tale. It said Neandertals mated with people who came out of Africa, but didn't go back. You are a bit on the dim side, you need to refill your meds.
The Neanderthal man did not come out of Africa. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
The Neanderthal man did not come out of Africa. 😏
No shyte sherlonk.

2 edits

Originally posted by sonhouse
No shyte sherlonk.
The Hidden History Of The Human Race



FORBIDDEN ARCHEOLOGY: Secret Discoveries of Early Man

One main problem with archeology and geology is that the time of all events in history are not known. They can determine the logical order of events, but can not know or determine the exact timing of the events in the ancient past with surety without eyewitness recorded records.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
The Hidden History Of The Human Race

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRZL7tcLgX8

FORBIDDEN ARCHEOLOGY: Secret Discoveries of Early Man

One main problem with archeology and geology is that the time of all events in history are not known. They can determine the logical order of events, but can not know or determine the exact timing of the events in ...[text shortened]... with surety without eyewitness recorded records.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4
So where are the papers you have written about this subject since you are a self admitted expert.


Originally posted by sonhouse
So where are the papers you have written about this subject since you are a self admitted expert.
They are in my library gathering dust. They are too earth shaking for mere mortals like you to read. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
They are in my library gathering dust. They are too earth shaking for mere mortals like you to read. 😏
Good, they will then join the dust bin of the history of failed tries.


Originally posted by sonhouse
Good, they will then join the dust bin of the history of failed tries.
Scientists still have the ability to be wrong about billions of years of rock to man evolution.😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Scientists still have the ability to be wrong about billions of years of rock to man evolution.😏
Yes they do and it IS an ability. An ability creationists like you and Hovind do not have because they can never change no matter WHAT is discovered, They would just poo poo everything said about the age of the Earth if it was as much as 1000 years older than 6000 years old. Which is total BS.


Originally posted by sonhouse
Yes they do and it IS an ability. An ability creationists like you and Hovind do not have because they can never change no matter WHAT is discovered, They would just poo poo everything said about the age of the Earth if it was as much as 1000 years older than 6000 years old. Which is total BS.
No, the 6,000 year age is not written in stone by the hand of God. We say about 6,000 years, because it is a human approximation of our understanding of scripture and other records of the past. Therefore, it could leave time for another 1,000 years if sufficient evidence is revealed to support it without compromise of the Holy Bible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
No, the 6,000 year age is not written in stone by the hand of God. We say about 6,000 years, because it is a human approximation of our understanding of scripture and other records of the past. Therefore, it could leave time for another 1,000 years if sufficient evidence is revealed to support it without compromise of the Holy Bible.
How bout 8K? Do we hear 9? Over there, 10K? 10.5K? Last call, 10,6?


Originally posted by sonhouse
How bout 8K? Do we hear 9? Over there, 10K? 10.5K? Last call, 10,6?
In my opinion, that would be stretching the time line out too much and is not reasonable based on what we know of history at this point in time.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
In my opinion, that would be stretching the time line out too much and is not reasonable based on what we know of history at this point in time.
So you would go to 7K but not 8k?


Originally posted by sonhouse
So you would go to 7K but not 8k?
I doubt it for it does not make sense to me today.