Seismic activity as a sign of the last days

-Removed-

I see so you cannot say and once again insist on pandering your opinion as if it has some efficacy beyond the hot air which inflates it. Once again you seem to have little to contribute except the usual dull 'contentious for contentiousness sake', style arguments which has marred your entire posting history. How so thoroughly predictable and so thoroughly banal.

-Removed-

more irrelevant nothingness. We are well aware of your douchbaggery and how you attempt to turn any issue against those people you find objectionable, but it wont happen here for this thread is about Jesus prophecy and the scientific data which has been used to establish it, its no place for your prejudices, hatred and rampant douchebaggery, move along, you clearly have nothing worth contributing.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
because my dear Wolfgang we must go by what is known ie recorded data rather than what is not known. Surely this is the empirical scientific method?

And "what is known" is that geology does not work in decades or centuries.
You cannot seriously believe that one decade or one century will have similar
seismic activity to another. It is (for all intents) random (the frequency) and
although we can say some events are "overdue" it doesn't mean they
are going to happen tomorrow or even in 100 years.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
And "what is known" is that geology does not work in decades or centuries.
You cannot seriously believe that one decade or one century will have similar
seismic activity to another. It is (for all intents) random (the frequency) and
although we can say some events are "overdue" it doesn't mean they
are going to happen tomorrow or even in 100 years.

Again no one has made this claim, either there has been an increase in the magnitude and frequency of measurable seismic activity or there has not and all we can know with any certainty is what has been measured by the scientific method.

-Removed-

Yes this is no place for your douchebaggery.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
really, which of the following data is in your words, 'unreliable',

The bit where you claim there is a significant increase.
You don't give a source, but I am guessing you got that from Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_20th-century_earthquakes

Wikipedia includes a kind of chart and there is no indication of an increase in the chart.

Originally posted by twhitehead
The bit where you claim there is a significant increase.
You don't give a source, but I am guessing you got that from Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_20th-century_earthquakes

Wikipedia includes a kind of chart and there is no indication of an increase in the chart.

All these facts you keep presenting are an intolerable distraction from the selected handful of facts with uncertain and who-cares-what provenance that can be seen in a certain light at a particular time of day weather permitting if you squint one eye to suggest that maybe ...

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Again no one has made this claim, either there has been an increase in the magnitude and frequency of measurable seismic activity or there has not and all we can know with any certainty is what has been measured by the scientific method.

Obviously what I am saying is that even if an increase can be shown it is irrelevant.

Originally posted by googlefudge
There is probably an increase in Earthquakes hitting heavily populated areas over the last century,
as the number of heavily populated areas increases this is pretty inevitable.

But as you say, nobody in the relevant field is concerned about any great increase in earthquake
frequency... mainly because there isn't one.


I still find it hard to ...[text shortened]... in almost every metric you care to name in making life better for the majority
of human kind.

I find this amusing, because this reminds me of the far-right's view that global warming is "nonsense".

-Removed-

Now this, I can actually agree with.