Originally posted by ivanhoeIt did only exist in his mind until he expressed it. However, no
[b]lioyank: "i thought that it was a matter of ivanhoe vs. the wolfpack which, at the time, i thought only existed within ivanhoe's mind. not only were u (collectively) denying the existence of a wolfpack, u were making ivanhoe seem delusional."
That's absolutely right. They have proven to be the liars.[/b]
one, as yet, has ever defined the members of the WolfPack(tm).
No one knows how membership is gained, no one knows when
they are inducted, no one knows what the criteria are for being a
successful member.
Just meaningless accusations.
To this day, I do not know if I am a member or not.
Nemesio
Originally posted by NemesioNemesio: "It did only exist in his mind until he expressed it. ..... "
It did only exist in his mind until he expressed it. However, no
one, as yet, has ever defined the members of the WolfPack(tm).
No one knows how membership is gained, no one knows when
they are inducted, no one knows what the criteria are for being a
successful member.
Just meaningless accusations.
To this day, I do not know if I am a member or not.
Nemesio
Ha ha ha ..... 😵
Still wriggling like a caught eel ...... 😀
1 edit
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesIt's true!
Face it. You created a monster.
He claimed that this organization existed and, by virtue of
this proclamation, it came into being.
Ivanhoe, that makes you God-like!
And, just like the Bible, there are lots of loose ends and confusion.
Do you care to provide more revelation about the WolfPack(tm) that
we, its humble members, might know more fully the capacity of your
preternatural mind?
Nemesio
Originally posted by ivanhoeSet me free! Am I a member and, if so, what did I do to
Ha ha ha ..... 😵
Still wriggling like a caught eel ...... 😀
merit this dubious distinction?
Is Cribs a member?
Is RoyalChicken?
Is #1? (I think I know the answer to this one)
Is bbarr?
Are there other members than those listed above?
Nemesio
2 edits
From the RedHotPawn Terms of Service (ToS):
"You agree to not use the Service to:
Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
It seems to me No1marauder is clearly violating these ToS
EDIT ..... again and again and again and ...... etc etc.
1 edit
Originally posted by ivanhoeDo you agree with these premises:
You're the logician ... I never claimed such a thing.
1) The moderators know and understand the standard you cited.
2) No1's behavior clearly violates that standard.
3) A competent moderator will take action against a poster who posts in a manner that is clearly in violation of the standards of the ToS.
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesKeep on playing your games .... they are so amusing ..... 😵
Do you agree with these premises:
1) The moderators know and understand the standard you cited.
2) No1's behavior clearly violates that standard.
3) A competent moderator will take action against a poster who posts in a manner that is clearly in violation of the standards of the ToS.
Originally posted by ivanhoeFrom the RedHotPawn Terms of Service (ToS) paragraph 6:
From the RedHotPawn Terms of Service (ToS):
"You agree to not use the Service to:
Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
It see ...[text shortened]... er is clearly violating these ToS
EDIT ..... again and again and again and ...... etc etc.
You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable.
Even assuming, for the sake of argument only, that any of my posts fit in the categories enumerated later in the paragraph, since you agreed to the above sentence it's your tough luck. The Site Admins, of course, are the sole judges of what is allowable content here. So suck it up, Sparky.
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderYou spit it out marauder, you just spit it out ...... but that doesn't mean I have to suck it up, Mausie .......
From the RedHotPawn Terms of Service (ToS) paragraph 6:
You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable.
Even assuming, for the sake of argument only, that any of my posts fit in the categories enumerated later in the paragraph, since you agreed to the above sentence ...[text shortened]... Admins, of course, are the sole judges of what is allowable content here. So suck it up, Sparky.
EDIT: Not even according to the ToS ..... ha ha ha 😛