Originally posted by NordlysOriginally posted by ivanhoe
Well, maybe you should correct me, then. And if you neither see yourself as a victim nor have a problem with strong language in the forums, you should also explain why you think posts with strong language should be alerted.
As I said: you assume too much.
Well, maybe you should correct me, then. And if you neither see yourself as a victim nor have a problem with strong language in the forums, you should also explain why you think posts with strong language should be alerted.
Originally posted by ivanhoe
From the RHP ToS:
http://www.redhotpawn.com/myhome/termsofs ...[text shortened]... ul, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
Harm minors in any way; ..... etc."
Originally posted by ivanhoeWhat's "unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable" is open to interpretation. And even if people would agree that something is against the rule, that still doesn't necessarily mean that something needs to be done about it. Or do you alert the police everytime you see someone cross the street when the traffic lights are red?
Originally posted by ivanhoe
As I said: you assume too much.
Well, maybe you should correct me, then. And if you neither see yourself as a victim nor have a problem with strong language in the forums, you should also explain why you think posts with strong language should be alerted.
Originally posted by ivanhoe
From the RHP ToS:
http://w ...[text shortened]... ul, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
Harm minors in any way; ..... etc."
In other words, I still didn't get an explanation why you feel it's necessary to alert the moderators whenever strong language is used.
1 edit
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesThe things that no1 says have absolutely nothing to do with why I think he should be banned.
I did not say this. I merely denied that they should have been said in a different way.
That is, I don't agree that there is any particular rendering of the ideas which ought to have been chosen. No1's was fine, a different way might have been fine. There is no right answer when it comes to expressing one's ideas linguistically - it's a mat
The things that no1 says have absolutely nothing to do with why I think he should be banned.[/b]
All anybody does here is say things. Perhaps you could clarify.
1 edit
Originally posted by ivanhoeI sent a copy of my original list to the moderators. They have done nothing. I'm not sure what the point is except that there is obvious favoritism going on.
.
I advise everyone to alert the moderators in case they spot a post wherein the RHP ToS are clearly being violated.
I reported No1marauder's latest post in this thread because he clearly insults and degrades an RHP member (in this case it is me, but it could have been everybody ..... ). Please report it, because the mods need these alerts to be able to act against it.
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressI heard it cracked them up, too. There's still wondering why Salma's snake dance post was offensive in anybody's "mind". Yes, it obvious I'm being favored by the Site Admins since I so blatantly suck up to them every chance I get. Brown-nosing is an art form you really should work on ChessExpress,though it might help if you were a paying customer.
I sent a copy of my original list to the moderators. They have done nothing. I'm not sure what the point is except that there is obvious favoritism going on.