28 Dec '05 17:10>
Originally posted by KnightWulfe1. It doesn't prove anything about Jesus. Assuming there was a historical Jesus who was crucified (and hopefully, you're not one of the conspiracy-theorists claiming he never existed at all), it could be his.
If it is authentic from the Roman time period as a burial shroud, One, how does it prove that Jesus was alive - it could be from any burial....
The other question I have is why is the "image" on the Shroud depicting the standard "english" version of what Christ looked like. Look at the area from where he is supposed to be birthed.... Fair hair and pale skin are not traits of that region, or any region close to that one.
2. I don't see fair hair and pale skin on the Shroud. Do you?