17 Oct '11 10:11>
I was surfing the net recently and reading about Skepticism. Some findings there shocked me, some made me think that I must bring them to the notice of fellow theists for their comments. Of course, atheists are also welcome to comment and elucidate, but ,probably they already know this stuff by heart ! So, here goes !
i)" Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration-courage,
clear thinking, honesty, fairness and above all, love of truth "------H.L.Mencken.
Really ? A Dasa in reverse ? What do you say ?
ii) " Knowledge is impossible "---Philosophical Skepticism tenet. Really ? A one
stroke destroyer of Science and Religion both. What do you say ?
iii) " No truth was quite true "---F.H.Bradley
iv) " Truth is an ideal expression of the Universe; at once coherent and
comprehensive. It must not conflict with itself, and there must be no
suggestion which fails to fall inside it. Perfect truth in short must realize the
idea of a systematic whole "--- F.H.Bradley again ( unless it is Mark Alan
Walker of markalanwalker.com ) A holdall definition ? Do Scientific findings
answer this definition ? Do Theological findings answer this definition ?
I think that each of the above statements may require a separate thread. If you
think so, by all means form separate threads.
i)" Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration-courage,
clear thinking, honesty, fairness and above all, love of truth "------H.L.Mencken.
Really ? A Dasa in reverse ? What do you say ?
ii) " Knowledge is impossible "---Philosophical Skepticism tenet. Really ? A one
stroke destroyer of Science and Religion both. What do you say ?
iii) " No truth was quite true "---F.H.Bradley
iv) " Truth is an ideal expression of the Universe; at once coherent and
comprehensive. It must not conflict with itself, and there must be no
suggestion which fails to fall inside it. Perfect truth in short must realize the
idea of a systematic whole "--- F.H.Bradley again ( unless it is Mark Alan
Walker of markalanwalker.com ) A holdall definition ? Do Scientific findings
answer this definition ? Do Theological findings answer this definition ?
I think that each of the above statements may require a separate thread. If you
think so, by all means form separate threads.