26 Nov '11 04:16>1 edit
Originally posted by sumydidWell the book wouldn't be seen as a "success" by the overwhelming majority his peers working in science. That is relevant, surely?
No. The success or failure of the book is completely irrelevant.
And you pointedly mentioned that what he was doing before he wrote books on intelligent design was "lucrative". So I ask again, are you suggesting that "The Signature in the Cell" - or his other books on intelligent design - have not been lucrative for Stephen Meyer?
You are clearly insinuating that publishing the book (or maybe you mean his previous books) represented a financial sacrifice for Meyer. Can you substantiate this at all?
One final point, are you claiming he "dared come out with" the idea of intelligent design in his book "The Signature in the Cell"?