09 May '13 13:01>
Originally posted by robbie carrobiedo you accept the possibility that your god does not exist?
I dunno, you and proper knob seem quite real.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI know you have no way of knowing whether they exist, you've stated that already, but that is now what I'm asking.
I have told you that I have no way of knowing whether they exist or not and have formed no beliefs as to their existence or otherwise.
Originally posted by robbie carrobienot bad, youve gone up (slightly) in my estimation. does this not cause you religious problems, i thought you had to believe 100%, as tiny as the percentage may be are you not questioning gods existence?
Do i accept the possibility? its possible, but unlikely.
Originally posted by Proper KnobI have formed no beliefs as to the existence or non existence of fairies, unicorns, santa clause, elfs or any other creatures regarded as mythical.
I know you have no way of knowing whether they exist, you've stated that already, but that is now what I'm asking.
So let me get this straight, you're a 44 year old man who cannot say one way or the other whether you believe fairies exist or not? Implausible.
What about Santa Claus? Do you believe he exists?
Originally posted by stellspalfiedude as the article points out, debates with regard to the existence or non existence of God are futile. If you are willing to keep your belief within the realms of a subjective belief then fine, if you are offering evidence to substantiate your belief then fine, as soon as you make a truth claim, without substantiating evidence, whether theist or atheist, you have gone beyond the realm of subjective belief and are bordering on arrogance, irrationality and non science.
not bad, youve gone up (slightly) in my estimation. does this not cause you religious problems, i thought you had to believe 100%, as tiny as the percentage may be are you not questioning gods existence?
Originally posted by divegeesterrobbie did not write the article, it makes a case against both theists and atheists.
Originally posted by stellspalfie
[b]okay, which parts do you agree with and which parts do you disagree with. you posted it, it must have some relevance to you.
I think it's robbies long-winded over-engeered way of calling atheists arrogant.[/b]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'm saying that i find it beyond the realms of fantasy, implausible in the extreme and an insult to mine, and every other sentient human being on this planets, intelligence. That you are claiming, at the age of 44, to have formed no beliefs, at all, with regard to fairies, goblins, unicorns, elfs, griffins, Santa Claus and any other mythical creature I can think of.
ok, then are you claiming to know more about my non beliefs than i do myself?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think the 2 core claims at the start of the article are wrong and poorly written
robbie did not write the article, it makes a case against both theists and atheists.