- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI find it tragic when a person is so desperate to discredit someone that they have to spread lies about them.
I do genuinely find it rather tragic when a person is so desperate for attention they have to repeatedly reinvent themselves every time people get fed up with their present persona.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeVirtually nobody was talking to Fetchmyjunk towards the end of that screen name's tenure and then dj2becker hit the ground running by pretending he was someone different. In late-December - January dj2becker addressed only two people with almost 85% of his posts.
I do genuinely find it rather tragic when a person is so desperate for attention they have to repeatedly reinvent themselves every time people get fed up with their present persona.
Originally posted by @fmfThe only vaguely interesting thing about him is why his chosen screen names never seem to get any better. A year from now he'll be on his sixth incarnation and be called something like preacher412.
Virtually nobody was talking to Fetchmyjunk towards the end of that screen name's tenure and then dj2becker hit the ground running by pretending he was someone different. In late-December - January dj2becker addressed only two people with almost 85% of his posts.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeInteresting to note that after a day of fairly frantic double-barrelled fetchmyjunkery, which broadly conformed to Gulf time ~ unless Romans1009 really did post throughout the U.S. night ~ and after some distinctly gawky double act 'banter' between them, they have both stopped posting and fallen silent at exactly the same time... strange but true. ..😉
The only vaguely interesting thing about him is why his chosen screen names never seem to get any better. A year from now he'll be on his sixth incarnation and be called something like preacher412.
-Removed-Is that an actual question?
I mean, I see the question mark at the end of a sentence structured to elicit a response in consideration of its content, but how can that be a serious attempt at ferreting out another person's perspective?
Broadly speaking, your question is foolish.
Utilizing a narrow scope, the forum side of the website is a direct reflection of the integrity of its posters as a whole, not the results of a singular contributor.
The evidence for a forum which sponsors an honest give and take is non-existent; what we are left with is perhaps 15-20 people spitting out their invective toward the handful of people who are interested in meaningful dialogue.
Choose your camp!
The main rule appears to demand participants belong to a sanctioned and recognized gang in order for the puerile to ensure they're throwing their poop at the right targets.
