1 edit
Originally posted by lauseyThese creationists who support evolution have no clue, so they hedge a bet on everything, and that is dishonest and a bit crazy as well, so their support carries zero creditability and is not useful.
So you are saying that out of the millions of scientists who have help develop technology and medicine, which includes vast studies in physics, chemistry and biology, are very honest, meticulous and thorough.
Yet, when it comes to evolution, they all fabricate a whole body of evidence just to support a false theory for some massive conspiracy theorist agen ...[text shortened]... ot be an atheist agenda, because many creationists also agree with evolution, as I said earlier.
Originally posted by vishvahetucan you tell me why evolotionists have no clue? (i think evolutionists is who you refering to not creationists) please explain to me why evolution is wrong. and please don't use general statements such as "it has insuficient proof" without explaining why you deem insuficient, what would be suficient or what is a false statement made by evolutionists.
These creationists who support evolution have no clue, so they hedge a bet on everything, and that is dishonest and a bit crazy as well, so their support carries zero creditability and is not useful.
Originally posted by ZahlanziIt isn't worth feeding this troll. This line of enquiry has been exhausted.
can you tell me why evolotionists have no clue? (i think evolutionists is who you refering to not creationists) please explain to me why evolution is wrong. and please don't use general statements such as "it has insuficient proof" without explaining why you deem insuficient, what would be suficient or what is a false statement made by evolutionists.
Originally posted by lauseyi know, i just thought one last snack. after that i am declaring my surrender.
It isn't worth feeding this troll. This line of enquiry has been exhausted.
also i don't thin he is a troll. if i remember correctly a troll posts stupid/outrageous topics in order to provoke and outraged response. i believe this is not the case. he seems to genuinely believe what he says and totally oblivious to the fact he may be wrong.
or he is the world's greatest troll
Originally posted by ZahlanziThe world's greatest troll, or the world's greatest half-wit. Either way, not worth feeding. 🙂
i know, i just thought one last snack. after that i am declaring my surrender.
also i don't thin he is a troll. if i remember correctly a troll posts stupid/outrageous topics in order to provoke and outraged response. i believe this is not the case. he seems to genuinely believe what he says and totally oblivious to the fact he may be wrong.
or he is the world's greatest troll
Originally posted by ZahlanziThe creationist who support evolution have no clue either way, so they subscribe to both, and thats a little bit crazy, because their creation theory is incorrect (Genesis) and the theory of evolution is incorrect also, so they have no clue whats going on.
can you tell me why evolotionists have no clue? (i think evolutionists is who you refering to not creationists) please explain to me why evolution is wrong. and please don't use general statements such as "it has insuficient proof" without explaining why you deem insuficient, what would be suficient or what is a false statement made by evolutionists.
You can read why evolution is false by reading " Forbidden Archeology" because I dont want to get into a discussion with you because your inquiry is not genuine!
Originally posted by vishvahetuYour post is dishonest, foolish and incorrect.
The creationist who support evolution have no clue either way, so they subscribe to both, and thats a little bit crazy, because their creation theory is incorrect (Genesis) and the theory of evolution is incorrect also, so they have no clue whats going on.
You can read why evolution is false by reading " Forbidden Archeology" because I dont want to get into a discussion with you because your inquiry is not genuine!
Originally posted by vishvahetuoh please oh please tell me why evolution is wrong. was that genuine enough? i could try in caps next time to convey how much i need you to tell me.
The creationist who support evolution have no clue either way, so they subscribe to both, and thats a little bit crazy, because their creation theory is incorrect (Genesis) and the theory of evolution is incorrect also, so they have no clue whats going on.
You can read why evolution is false by reading " Forbidden Archeology" because I dont want to get into a discussion with you because your inquiry is not genuine!
let me give you an example. i know hitler was wrong. jews being subhuman is one of history's dumbest idea. so if someone would tell me that jews are evil and if i want to know why i should read mein kampf i will tell him to get a life. but for the spirit of debate i will allow him to present his point. if his point is valid, i might be enticed to learn more.
so please, do make your point. and if you say i am not genuine and you will not bother, i will leave you alone.
2 edits
Originally posted by vishvahetu“...but you accept the evidence of the science people who have put it all together ...”
But when I say others have gone before me and have raised their consciousness, and have developed love for god, you dont accept this, but you accept the evidence of the science people who have put it all together....you have just accepted.
And the evidence you speak of is fabricated, by the dishonest scientists, and they have been caught so many times o perceive God, a person must purify their heart and mind first....are you willing to do this?
Yes; those “science people” gathered all the evidence and proof and put it “all together”. Why is that a problem? Why is accepting the evidence as evidence a problem? Why is accepting such credible evidence “blind”?
I have not personally gone around the world to prove the Earth is round and not flat.
But I accept the evidence from others (specifically, those “dishonest” “science people” 😛) that have done the research and discoveries for me and accepted their documented evidence as evidence.
Is such believe that such documented evidence is valid evidence “blind”? Or should I believe the old dogma that the Earth is flat? -if not, why should I think that documented evidence of, say, evolution, is valid evidence “blind”?
In other words, how can we rationally arbitrarily use one kind of logic to reject one set of documented scientific evidence but yet arbitrarily use a different kind of logic to accept another set of documented scientific evidence? -this would be logically inconsistent.
“...To perceive God, a person must purify their heart and mind first....are you willing to do this? ...”
Sorry, don't do drugs. And I have no desire to hallucinate and see a “God” nor the tooth-fairy.
Originally posted by Andrew HamiltonCan you see why a I cannot talk with you, because you talk silly talk , like a six year old, and its impossible to talk to dishonest people, because they will not accept any truth that goes against their false beliefs.....and until you get honest, I cannot discuss with you any further on this post..
“...but you accept the evidence of the science people who have put it all together ...”
Yes; those “science people” gathered all the evidence and proof and put it “all together”. Why is that a problem? Why is accepting the evidence as evidence a problem? Why is accepting such credible evidence “blind”?
I have not personally gone around the worl ...[text shortened]... Sorry, don't do drugs. And I have no desire to hallucinate and see a “God” nor the tooth-fairy.
Originally posted by vishvahetuIf all else fails, go for the ad hominem.
Can you see why a I cannot talk with you, because you talk silly talk , like a six year old, and its impossible to talk to dishonest people, because they will not accept any truth that goes against their false beliefs.....and until you get honest, I cannot discuss with you any further on this post..