19 Apr '06 21:51>
Originally posted by no1marauder1. From the 19th century on, yes.
To recap, according to LH:
1) Enlightenment figures who read Bruno and regarded him as a kindred thinker were wrong;
2) Those modern historians who believe that Bruno was a forerunner of the Enlightenment are also wrong.
2. I didn't say that. Those modern historians (Yates, Kristeller) who believe that Bruno was a "forerunner" of the Enlightenment believe that the Enlightenment itself was born of (pardon the expression) un-enlightened movements like Hermeticism. Surely you've heard of how modern experimental science originated from the efforts of mediaeval alchemists to find the mythical Philosopher's Stone? Well, this is the academic version of the same theory.