15 Nov '10 20:42>
a true church of the christ.
( islam is a religion created by a pedophile and murderer ).
( islam is a religion created by a pedophile and murderer ).
Originally posted by reinfeldI thought when there were differances in belief between the Book of Mormon and the Bible happened the Mormons would usually lean toward the Book of Mormon. Is that correct?
a true church of the christ.
( islam is a religion created by a pedophile and murderer ).
Originally posted by galveston75Differences?? Mormons use both books and when one reads the Book of Mormon ( as I have done) it is rather amazing how it mirrors much of the Bible. It even is written in old English, like the original Kings James version. Which proves that old English has been spoken for thousands of years and is not native to Britain at all. Actually whenever facts change biblically the Book of Mormon is changed. Something to do with the Umma and Thumin I think.
I thought when there were differances in belief between the Book of Mormon and the Bible happened the Mormons would usually lean toward the Book of Mormon. Is that correct?
Originally posted by caissad4According to the undisputed inerrant fount of all knowledge, Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Mormon):
It even is written in old English, like the original Kings James version. Which proves that old English has been spoken for thousands of years and is not native to Britain at all.
Originally posted by PenguinHere are a few links relative to the origins of that most holy book of Mormon:
According to the undisputed inerrant fount of all knowledge, Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Mormon):
The Book of Mormon is a sacred text of the Latter Day Saint movement. It was [b]first published in March 1830 by Joseph Smith, Jr. as The Book of Mormon: An Account Written by the Hand of Mormon upon Plates Taken from the Plates of r myself as authoritative, let alone that I might think that you should)
--- Penguin.[/b]
Originally posted by PenguinThe Mormons have exact the same right to call whatever book they want as holy or sacred as christians, jews, moslems, buddhists, hindus, and whoever have.
According to the undisputed inerrant fount of all knowledge, Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Mormon):
The Book of Mormon is a sacred text of the Latter Day Saint movement. It was first published in March 1830 by Joseph Smith, Jr. as The Book of Mormon: An Account Written by the Hand of Mormon upon Plates Taken from the Plates of r myself as authoritative, let alone that I might think that you should)
--- Penguin.
Originally posted by FabianFnasexcept there are subtle differences.
The Mormons have exact the same right to call whatever book they want as holy or sacred as christians, jews, moslems, buddhists, hindus, and whoever have.
Originally posted by FabianFnasthey have the right, does not mean that its inspired, though. Indeed whereas the bible itself accurately portrays events, with dates, rulers, places, the book of mormon contains fictional portions unsupported or corroborated by history and archaeology. As Zhalansi states, its apples and oranges.
The Mormons have exact the same right to call whatever book they want as holy or sacred as christians, jews, moslems, buddhists, hindus, and whoever have.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI almost fell off my chair laughing at that one.
they have the right, does not mean that its inspired, though. Indeed whereas the bible itself accurately portrays events, with dates, rulers, places, the book of mormon contains fictional portions unsupported or corroborated by history and archaeology. As Zhalansi states, its apples and oranges.
Originally posted by FabianFnasAack. More unsupported crap bubbling forth from the putrid open sewer. Give it a rest, will ya? Until such time as you're able (not just willing) to put forward an actual refutation of any biblical account, stuff it.
The Mormons have exact the same right to call whatever book they want as holy or sacred as christians, jews, moslems, buddhists, hindus, and whoever have.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIt's been done so many times, so do I really have to?
Aack. More unsupported crap bubbling forth from the putrid open sewer. Give it a rest, will ya? Until such time as you're able (not just willing) to put forward an actual refutation of any biblical account, stuff it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThey have the right to believe what they want, exatly like you. I don't compare apples with oranges, I compare peoples right to have the right to chose their own religion, exactly as you have. I treat others as I wanted to be treated myself. So said Jesus, so says I.
they have the right, does not mean that its inspired, though. Indeed whereas the bible itself accurately portrays events, with dates, rulers, places, the book of mormon contains fictional portions unsupported or corroborated by history and archaeology. As Zhalansi states, its apples and oranges.
Originally posted by FabianFnasok 🙂
They have the right to believe what they want, exatly like you. I don't compare apples with oranges, I compare peoples right to have the right to chose their own religion, exactly as you have. I treat others as I wanted to be treated myself. So said Jesus, so says I.