1. Standard memberhuckleberryhound
    Devout Agnostic.
    DZ-015
    Joined
    12 Oct '05
    Moves
    42584
    17 Sep '10 11:17
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    Really? How do you come to that conclusion?
    All theories about the beginning of life are theories...if you have a provable explanation i would like to know how you proved it.
  2. Standard memberProper Knob
    Cornovii
    North of the Tamar
    Joined
    02 Feb '07
    Moves
    53689
    17 Sep '10 11:23
    Originally posted by huckleberryhound
    All theories about the beginning of life are theories...if you have a provable explanation i would like to know how you proved it.
    Evolution makes no claim on the origins of life. What you're talking about is the concept known as abiogenesis, different kettle of fish.

    Evolution (also known as biological, genetic or organic evolution) is the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

    In natural science, abiogenesis or biopoesis is the study of how life on Earth could have arisen from inanimate matter.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
  3. Standard memberhuckleberryhound
    Devout Agnostic.
    DZ-015
    Joined
    12 Oct '05
    Moves
    42584
    17 Sep '10 11:29
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    Evolution makes no claim on the origins of life. What you're talking about is the concept known as abiogenesis, different kettle of fish.

    Evolution (also known as biological, genetic or organic evolution) is the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution ...[text shortened]... Earth could have arisen from inanimate matter.[/i]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
    I could've looked that up before i posted aswell....my bad. I'm nearly at "taxi to airport" time...Sorry for the overly quick posts
  4. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    17 Sep '10 12:15
    Originally posted by huckleberryhound
    Current scientific theories on evolution are no more fact than any religious (though not all) theories - facts held together with supposition.
    I don't get it. You think science is somehow a good way to justify beliefs (at least it seems so from this topic) but on the other hand you reject the current scientific paradigms when you don't like them.
  5. Standard memberavalanchethecat
    Not actually a cat
    The Flat Earth
    Joined
    09 Apr '10
    Moves
    14988
    17 Sep '10 18:05
    Originally posted by huckleberryhound
    Current scientific theories on evolution are no more fact than any religious (though not all) theories - facts held together with supposition.
    Can't agree with that! DNA is real. Very similar but separate species have very similar but different DNA profiles. Random mutations definitely happen. Advantageous genetic traits definitely spread through a population. How is that not proof of evolution?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree