17 Sep '10 11:17>
Originally posted by Proper KnobAll theories about the beginning of life are theories...if you have a provable explanation i would like to know how you proved it.
Really? How do you come to that conclusion?
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundEvolution makes no claim on the origins of life. What you're talking about is the concept known as abiogenesis, different kettle of fish.
All theories about the beginning of life are theories...if you have a provable explanation i would like to know how you proved it.
Originally posted by Proper KnobI could've looked that up before i posted aswell....my bad. I'm nearly at "taxi to airport" time...Sorry for the overly quick posts
Evolution makes no claim on the origins of life. What you're talking about is the concept known as abiogenesis, different kettle of fish.
Evolution (also known as biological, genetic or organic evolution) is the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution ...[text shortened]... Earth could have arisen from inanimate matter.[/i]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundI don't get it. You think science is somehow a good way to justify beliefs (at least it seems so from this topic) but on the other hand you reject the current scientific paradigms when you don't like them.
Current scientific theories on evolution are no more fact than any religious (though not all) theories - facts held together with supposition.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundCan't agree with that! DNA is real. Very similar but separate species have very similar but different DNA profiles. Random mutations definitely happen. Advantageous genetic traits definitely spread through a population. How is that not proof of evolution?
Current scientific theories on evolution are no more fact than any religious (though not all) theories - facts held together with supposition.