Go back
The Satanic Roman Catholic Church

The Satanic Roman Catholic Church

Spirituality

2 edits
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
So this presumably means you [b]do think you're being funny?[/b]
Yes i find that fact that you think you have a monopoly on funny highly amusing. What else do you have a monopoly on, deadpan? droll? You have certainly corned the market in stalking old guys up and down the forum, but that's not nearly as amusing as your monopoly on funny.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes i find that fact that you think you have a monopoly on funny highly amusing.
But I don't think I have a monopoly on what is funny. That's something you have said, not me.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you have certainly corned the market in stalking old guys up and down the forum.
The stuff about the Carmelites was better than this,

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
But I don't think I have a monopoly on what is funny. That's something you have said, not me.
you seem to think that you do have a monopoly on funny in fact you were telling me only a minute ago what was funny and what was not.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
The stuff about the Carmelites was better than this,
better in what sense?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
better in what sense?
Better than you saying "you seem to think that you do have a monopoly on funny" four or five times in the space of only three posts, for example.

2 edits
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
The stuff about the Carmelites was better than this,
maybe you should preface your statements with, as far as i can discern or according to my understanding, or in my opinion etc etc and then we can understand that your statement have relevance to no one but you and that you don't really think you have a monopoly of funny even though you are giving the impression that you do. After all you know funny to such an extent that you are able to instruct others in what is funny.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
Better than you saying "you seem to think that you do have a monopoly on funny" four or five times in the space of only three posts, for example.
sorry buy your having a monopoly on funny was better than this.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
maybe you should preface your statements with, as far as i can discern or according to my understanding, or in my opinion etc etc and then we can understand that your statement have relevance to no one but you and that you don't really think you have a monopoly of funny even though you are giving the impression that you do.
It's now five or six times you've said the it in maybe less than a half a page.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sorry buy your having a monopoly on funny was better than this.
Is this seven times now, the same catchphrase?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
Is this seven times now, the same catchphrase?
you were instructing me about what funny is.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
Is this seven times now, the same catchphrase?
I am simply trying to understand why you might think that what you find funny applies to all persons, the only logical explanation is that you have a monopoly on funny.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you were instructing me about what funny is.
Maybe trying a little less hard to be funny might work for you. But it's up to you.😉

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

"Did too", "did not","did too", "did not".....Do you two realize you sound like two little children ranting about nothing?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by FMF
Maybe trying a little less hard to be funny might work for you. But it's up to you.😉
So you do have a monopoly on funny, that is amusing.