21 May '12 14:24>
We can start here.
Is Snowflake crystals development roughly analogous to the biolological Evolution process ?
YouTube
Is Snowflake crystals development roughly analogous to the biolological Evolution process ?
YouTube
Originally posted by jaywillIn what way?
We can start here.
Is Snowflake crystals development roughly analogous to the biolological Evolution process ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sOevibWgm4
Originally posted by jaywill"X is like Y in manner Z" is an analogy. As such, analogies do not exist in nature independent of some mind, because "Z" is the product of a mind that thinks it has found something it can use in an argument. 😉
We can start here.
Is Snowflake crystals development roughly analogous to the biolological Evolution process ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sOevibWgm4
Originally posted by jaywillive watched the clip and the two guys make the same mistake christians on here do. snowflakes are used as an example to show complexity arising from simplicity. they are not used as a comparison between a snowflakes structure and the development of a living organism.
We can start here.
Is Snowflake crystals development roughly analogous to the biolological Evolution process ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sOevibWgm4
Originally posted by stellspalfieSomeone snuck a Romanesco broccoli into that search result -- confirming that the analogy is strong. 🙂
ive watched the clip and the two guys make the same mistake christians on here do. snowflakes are used as an example to show complexity arising from simplicity. they are not used as a comparison between a snowflakes structure and the development of a living organism.
maybe it would be easier if rather than snowflakes (which christians seem to stuggl ...[text shortened]... al tinkering and voila amazing, beautiful, random seeming, individual, unique structures appear.
Originally posted by googlefudgeHe didn't explain this did he. He is often very unclear.
In what way?
What aspect of snowflake development are you asking is analogous to what aspect of biological evolution?
Originally posted by stellspalfieFirst you all must listen to the second movement of Howard Hanson's Third Symphony. Debate will continue after this musical interlude.
ive watched the clip and the two guys make the same mistake christians on here do. snowflakes are used as an example to show complexity arising from simplicity. they are not used as a comparison between a snowflakes structure and the development of a living organism.
maybe it would be easier if rather than snowflakes (which christians seem to stuggl ...[text shortened]... al tinkering and voila amazing, beautiful, random seeming, individual, unique structures appear.
Originally posted by jaywillit certainly is. its amazing how much beauty and complexity can be achieved with a few simple chords 🙂
First you all must listen to the second movement of [b] Howard Hanson's Third Symphony. Debate will continue after this musical interlude.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr3B8XHfR6k
Isn't that pretty ?[/b]
Originally posted by jaywilltoo slow for my taste. my life tempo is faster.
First you all must listen to the second movement of [b] Howard Hanson's Third Symphony. Debate will continue after this musical interlude.
II Kings 3:15
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr3B8XHfR6k
Isn't that pretty ?[/b]
Originally posted by stellspalfieAwesome!!!
ive watched the clip and the two guys make the same mistake christians on here do. snowflakes are used as an example to show complexity arising from simplicity. they are not used as a comparison between a snowflakes structure and the development of a living organism.
maybe it would be easier if rather than snowflakes (which christians seem to stuggl ...[text shortened]... al tinkering and voila amazing, beautiful, random seeming, individual, unique structures appear.