Originally posted by C Hess
Not junk, but non-coding. You just never quit, do you?
Whatever you evilutionists want to call it now, it is not proof of evolution. All of it together is more like evidence of the Creator.
Scientific Evidence that God Created Life
Ever since Stanley Miller's experiment produced some amino acids with a spark in 1953, evilutionists have claimed that lighting strickes caused amino acids and they came together on their own in a primordial soup or pond to make proteins. But amino acids will not link together to form proteins! It was a bit like claiming that if bricks formed in nature they would get together to build houses. Proteins are so hard to make that in all of nature, they never form except in already living cells.
Only proteins containing all left handed amino acids will work in living things because proteins which contain any right-handed amino acids have the wrong shape and will not connect properly to the proteins around them. In nature, all left handed amino acids are only formed by living cells and no proteins at all will form outside of cells.
Amino acids formed in experiments like Miller’s, are half left, and half right-handed so they will not work in the proteins of living things.
Evidence that life never comes from non-living materials is so abundant that it is a basic principle of science called the Principle of Biogenesis (living things come only from living things). This is more scientific evidence that life could not form without a Creator.
Atheists and many agnostics have faith that contrary to this basic principle of science, life did evolve spontaneously from chemicals at least once.
They now call their theory “abiogenesis” which comes from roots that mean “not Biogenesis.” They no longer use the term “spontaneous generation.”
Yet Atheist EVILutionists call creationists anti-science and having blind faith. Atheists EVILutionists look like hypocrites to the Near Genius. How about you?