1. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    14 Mar '07 01:13
    What do you think it is?

    1) His self-righteousness.
    2) His smugness.
    3) His equivocation.
    4) His neurotic sidekick Ivanhoe.
    5) His belief that his brand of Catholicism is empirically and objectively correct.
  2. Cosmos
    Joined
    21 Jan '04
    Moves
    11184
    14 Mar '07 07:26
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    What do you think it is?

    1) His self-righteousness.
    2) His smugness.
    3) His equivocation.
    4) His neurotic sidekick Ivanhoe.
    5) His belief that his brand of Catholicism is empirically and objectively correct.
    You missed out:

    6) His lack of logic.

    But of your 5, I would have to say 2.
  3. London
    Joined
    02 Mar '04
    Moves
    36066
    14 Mar '07 09:55
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    What do you think it is?

    1) His self-righteousness.
    2) His smugness.
    3) His equivocation.
    4) His neurotic sidekick Ivanhoe.
    5) His belief that his brand of Catholicism is empirically and objectively correct.
    Apparently, the fact that he thinks debating issues is more important than smearing people.
  4. Cosmos
    Joined
    21 Jan '04
    Moves
    11184
    14 Mar '07 14:47
    Originally posted by lucifershammer
    Apparently, the fact that he thinks debating issues is more important than smearing people.
    A perfect example of 2.
  5. Standard memberHand of Hecate
    Merciless Vagabond
    Deep in it.
    Joined
    08 Feb '05
    Moves
    14614
    14 Mar '07 15:54
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    What do you think it is?

    1) His self-righteousness.
    2) His smugness.
    3) His equivocation.
    4) His neurotic sidekick Ivanhoe.
    5) His belief that his brand of Catholicism is empirically and objectively correct.
    Funnily enough, with the exception of #5, I would have described you the same way. Strange that we so frequently we hate that which is ourselves.
  6. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    14 Mar '07 16:07
    Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
    Funnily enough, with the exception of #5, I would have described you the same way. Strange that we so frequently we hate that which is ourselves.
    Cite some examples of equivocation on my part.
  7. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    14 Mar '07 16:11
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    Cite some examples of equivocation on my part.
    Your opinions about the strictness of Catholicism.
  8. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    14 Mar '07 16:17
    Originally posted by Palynka
    Your opinions about the strictness of Catholicism.
    Show me where I use one term to toggle between referring to two different concepts in order to hold my argument together.
  9. The sky
    Joined
    05 Apr '05
    Moves
    10385
    14 Mar '07 16:18
    Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
    Funnily enough, with the exception of #5, I would have described you the same way. Strange that we so frequently we hate that which is ourselves.
    Ivanhoe is Doctor Scribbles' neurotic sidekick?

    Otherwise, I'd say "spot on".
  10. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    14 Mar '07 16:201 edit
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    Show me where I use one term to toggle between referring to two different concepts in order to hold my argument together.
    I don't think this thread requires evidence, or else your first post is bunk.

    Besides, we're all stating the obvious here.
  11. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    14 Mar '07 16:20
    Originally posted by Nordlys
    Ivanhoe is Doctor Scribbles' neurotic sidekick?

    Otherwise, I'd say "spot on".
    Royalchicken played that role for some time.
  12. Standard memberHand of Hecate
    Merciless Vagabond
    Deep in it.
    Joined
    08 Feb '05
    Moves
    14614
    14 Mar '07 16:26
    Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
    Cite some examples of equivocation on my part.
    You continue to flip flop on whether or not you'd have sexual relations with Brittney Spears.

    Otherwise, you are a self-righteous, smug, Ivanhoe obsessed, meglomaniac, know it all, pompous blow hard with delusions of grandeur. These are some of the traits I admire most in you.
  13. Standard memberHand of Hecate
    Merciless Vagabond
    Deep in it.
    Joined
    08 Feb '05
    Moves
    14614
    14 Mar '07 16:28
    Originally posted by Palynka
    Royalchicken played that role for some time.
    Yes, Scribbles is completely obsessed with Ivanhoe's blithering. The man just can't let it go and pursues Ivanhoe with single minded determination. Hence, while 'sidekick' might be a misnomer, they are still joined at the hip.
  14. Standard memberDoctorScribbles
    BWA Soldier
    Tha Brotha Hood
    Joined
    13 Dec '04
    Moves
    49088
    14 Mar '07 16:29
    Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
    You continue to flip flop on whether or not you'd have sexual relations with Brittney Spears.
    I've never before commented on that.

    For the record, let me be perfectly clear: I would have given her the bone before she cut off her hair, no doubt about it.
  15. London
    Joined
    02 Mar '04
    Moves
    36066
    14 Mar '07 18:241 edit
    Originally posted by howardgee
    A perfect example of 2.
    Actually, the closest on the list is (1).

    smug: marked by excessive complacency or self-satisfaction; "a smug glow of self-congratulation"
    (wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn)

    EDIT: THIS post is closer to (2).
Back to Top