26 Mar '08 19:28>2 edits
Originally posted by vistesdI've made that argument (though you've stated it better than I have) and still feel it's a valid one.
Thanks, man: how ya doin’?
As I recall, your argument is something like—
(1) An omniscient god would know what is the best of all possible worlds.
(2) An omnipotent God can create the best of all possible worlds.
(3) An omni-good God will create the best of all possible worlds.
(4) God is O-O-O.
(5) God is the creator of the world.
...[text shortened]... “omni-good”. If some theist wants to argue that God’s omni-goodness entails malevolence, fine.
However, my musings on the matter have went a little beyond "the best of all worlds" argument. The whole concept of an "all knowing" entity who "exists out of time" i.e. experiences all points on an infinite timeline simultaneously is problematic. Since individual points in time really have no meaning for this thing, "when" does it ever decide to do anything? Logically how could it? Quite simply, such a creature would be aware of what it did FOREVER but have no power EVER to decide to change what it was "about" to do. It would be a being utterly without free will in any sense of the word.
Upon consideration, the Christian theists here seem to be approaching Eastern concepts of "God" though still clinging to dualism. Perhaps such a view is akin to Taoism:
There is a thing, formless yet complete.
Before heaven and earth it existed.
Without sound, without substance,
it stands alone and unchanging.
It is all-pervading and unfailing.
One may think of it as the mother of all beneath Heaven.
We do not know its name, but we call it Tao.
25. [Bodde].
Deep and still, it seems to have existed forever.
4.
From the Tao Te Ching