Go back
theory and prediction

theory and prediction

Spirituality

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
What makes (1) a fact?
It has been observed and measured - proven mathematically.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ringtailhunter

You know God is not a fact but faith.
Why do you chastise Nemesio instead of Coletti.

Coletti is the one who claims that God's existence is a fact, not Nemesio.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Coletti
It has been observed and measured - pr oven mathematically.
I see. So, one person's observation of something is sufficient for that something to be a fact?

How do you apply this to the contradictory Gospels, whose observations yield different conclusions about the stone and the angels at the tomb? Is each contradictory account factual by virtue of the observations reported therein?

If a deaf person goes to a rock concert and reports that he observed no sound, does that mean the band didn't play?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
What makes (1) a fact?
Cause Colletti says it is , and pluto didn't exist 200 years ago because Nemesio can't "prove " it

so there!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Why do you chastise Nemesio instead of Coletti.

Coletti is the one who claims that God's existence is a fact, not Nemesio.
Give me a break Mr. Scribbly. You know what I am saying. You know very well that the thoughts and the beliefs of Nemiseo are more against the poster than what is posted. I chastise him because of his hypocrisies, simple as that.

RTh

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ringtailhunter
Give me a break Mr. Scribbly. You know what I am saying. You know very well that the thoughts and the beliefs of Nemiseo are more against the poster than what is posted. I chastise him because of his hypocrisies, simple as that.

RTh
Is Coletti right or wrong when he claims that God's existence is a fact?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Is Coletti right or wrong when he claims that God's existence is a fact?
You know very well it is not fact. As I have stated, it is faith. My issue is with the false stature of an otherwise decent person (I believe, as with you) about knocking the beliefs of others.

You also cannot prove your end.

RTh

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ringtailhunter
You know very well it is not fact.
Do you think Coletti knows very well that it is not a fact?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Why do you chastise Nemesio instead of Coletti.

Coletti is the one who claims that God's existence is a fact, not Nemesio.
I'm saying that "existences" is irrelevant. God exists. The question should is whether a particular definition of God is real or imaginary.

Unicorns exist. Mars exists. Plant X which has never been observed by human minds exists. All things exists that can be defined either as real or hypothetical. The question is not is does thing A exist. The question is, is the definition of thing A true.

Saying God exists is nothing more than saying that a particular definition of God is true.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Is Coletti right or wrong when he claims that God's existence is a fact?
I will say that the truth of God is not a scientific fact. God is not proven by empirical data.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Coletti

Unicorns exist.
Are they in the same phylum as talking serpents, do you suppose?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Do you think Coletti knows very well that it is not a fact?
What do you want me to say.......what is fact to him, and what is not? I know there have been plenty of people who have died because they have faith, but I don't know of one person who has died because they believe in a fact.....do you?
Rediculouse question.

RTh

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ringtailhunter
I don't know of one person who has died because they believe in a fact
Wasn't Galileo condemned for believing in a fact?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Wasn't Galileo condemned for believing in a fact?
He was condemned for believing in theory.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Coletti
I will say that the truth of God is not a scientific fact. God is not proven by empirical data.
however you treat it as a scientific fact, one that all science must be in accordance with.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.