Originally posted by karoly aczel
1.There is disagreement about biblical history. Carbondating has blown some former truths out of the water(Am I right on that one?)
But you were talking about scientists, not creationists. The Biblical account does is not "accepted history" and therefore does not need rewriting. You seemed to be suggesting that scientists disagreed with each other, yet your defense seems to be that they disagree with creationists.
I think there is a kernel of truth to what vishva is saying, scientists are human after all, I watch the Big Bang Theory from time to time🙂
I am sure you have disagreed with you parents at one time (as have we all). Does it follow that there is a 'kernel of truth' in the claim that "there is much turbulence/disagreement/upheaval in your family"?
I am sure that scientists have made mistakes in Chemistry and disagree about a couple of points but does that mean there would be a 'kernel of truth' in the claim that
"Nine tenths of the talk on Chemistry, is sheer nonsense, not founded in observation, and wholly unsupported by facts. "
vishva has admitted ignorance of Evolution yet persists in attacking it with outright lies that he copies and pasts of creationist websites. These websites are created by people he has also accused of being dishonest.
If you have a specific point about science and disagreement amongst scientists, then you might make some sense, but there is no 'kernel of truth' in what vishva has said. Only a 'kernel of dishonesty'.