Originally posted by sumydid I think we're done here.
So suddenly, according to the great twite head, the "missing link" was never missing at all. Well great, then I'll just take a trip to the local zoo and ask the gorilla behind the bars, what the meaning of life is.
Whether you genuinely don't understand what I'm saying, or you're faking it just to be difficult... either way there's no point in wasting my time.
Define what you mean by "missing link" so that we are all on the same page.
Originally posted by stoker 4 TIMES my friend, and other books
You can not speed read the Holy Bible and really understand it. It requires study like a school testbook. For example, Algebra, Chemistry, or English grammar. You do not hurry through those types of books, if you really want to learn something.
Originally posted by RJHinds You can not speed read the Holy Bible and really understand it. It requires study like a school testbook. For example, Algebra, Chemistry, or English grammar. You do not hurry through those types of books, if you really want to learn something.
Originally posted by RJHinds You can not speed read the Holy Bible and really understand it. It requires study like a school testbook. For example, Algebra, Chemistry, or English grammar. You do not hurry through those types of books, if you really want to learn something.
after 50 + years i can never speed read, i study slowly too slowly
Originally posted by Rank outsider Maybe he should use a computer to speed up the process to finding the right answers?
One day we will have a little algorithm on this forum that can automatically flag faulty arguments. So the moment someone posts it might say 'Strawman', or 'Argument from authority' etc.
The only problem is the theists would leave.
Originally posted by twhitehead One day we will have a little algorithm on this forum that can automatically flag faulty arguments. So the moment someone posts it might say 'Strawman', or 'Argument from authority' etc.
The only problem is the theists would leave.
the whole forum points out how faulty rjhinds' or dasa's arguments are. a 10 year old can see that. pointing faults in someone's argument doesn't make them leave. what internet do you go to usually?
i also take offence on the implication that all theists are in the same bowl as the likes of rj and dasa.
Originally posted by Zahlanzi the whole forum points out how faulty rjhinds' or dasa's arguments are. a 10 year old can see that. pointing faults in someone's argument doesn't make them leave.
For some odd reason they think they are getting away with it or something. I was just hoping they might react differently if the computer spotted their errors straight off. I wonder if we had more arguments over spelling before the advent of spell checkers. I guess there were always dictionaries.
i also take offence on the implication that all theists are in the same bowl as the likes of rj and dasa. Sorry, I apologize for that. I certainly didn't mean to imply that you were as bad as them. I honestly do not recall you using strawman arguments or arguments from authority, so I was wrong to over generalize like that.
I must also admit that atheists are not always perfect with their arguments either (I know I'm not).
So lets just say about half the theists (who we know regularly use faulty arguments) would be affected. Of course they would probably just deny deny deny as they do now.
Originally posted by Zahlanzi the whole forum points out how faulty rjhinds' or dasa's arguments are. a 10 year old can see that. pointing faults in someone's argument doesn't make them leave. what internet do you go to usually?
i also take offence on the implication that all theists are in the same bowl as the likes of rj and dasa.
Hey, I know you are not in the same camp as the famous big three of ignorance and bigotry and dogma of the RJ/Kelly/sonship clade. You have reasoned arguments coming from your own mind. That three.....
To Suzianne on Evolution
24 Mar '13 10:54
Back to Top