"So, Your Honor, the Pledge is unconstitutional because it says 'Under God.' Guess that means when you were sworn in with your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated, 'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional, therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't mean squat!"
Originally posted by flyUnityI like it!🙂
"So, Your Honor, the Pledge is unconstitutional because it says 'Under God.' Guess that means when you were sworn in with your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated, 'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional, therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't mean squat!"
Originally posted by flyUnityThey didn't rule the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. They ruled that having public school children recite the Pledge with the words "under God" in it was unconstitutional. The Pledge is perfectly OK without the words "under God" which were, of course, added in 1953 about 50 years after the Pledge was written.
"So, Your Honor, the Pledge is unconstitutional because it says 'Under God.' Guess that means when you were sworn in with your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated, 'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional, therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't mean squat!"
A judge doesn't have to use the term "So help me God" or swear on a Bible to be sworn in; he may simply affirm if he chooses to. It's in the Constitution; I'll give you a cookie if you can find it on your own.
Originally posted by no1marauderYour right, but I still like it.😏
They didn't rule the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. They ruled that having public school children recite the Pledge with the words "under God" in it was unconstitutional. The Pledge is perfectly OK without the words "under God" which were, of course, added in 1953 about 50 years after the Pledge was written.
A judge doesn't hav ...[text shortened]... e chooses to. It's in the Constitution; I'll give you a cookie if you can find it on your own.
Originally posted by no1marauderhehe, I know, I just like to jab fun at you guys
They didn't rule the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. They ruled that having public school children recite the Pledge with the words "under God" in it was unconstitutional. The Pledge is perfectly OK without the words "under God" which were, of course, added in 1953 about 50 years after the Pledge was written.
A judge doesn't hav ...[text shortened]... e chooses to. It's in the Constitution; I'll give you a cookie if you can find it on your own.
Originally posted by flyUnityLOL.
"So, Your Honor, the Pledge is unconstitutional because it says 'Under God.' Guess that means when you were sworn in with your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated, 'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional, therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't mean squat!"
Originally posted by flyUnityI doubt that you knew ANY of the information I gave in my post as I'm sure your sources of info are right wing websites and propaganda mills. I wouldn't be surprised if your entire first post was a cut and paste that you didn't give credit for.
hehe, I know, I just like to jab fun at you guys
Originally posted by no1marauderOMG, I didnt know you would be so offended, I did not get this from a right wing website, although I did cut and paste this from an individual whos name I wont give out.
I doubt that you knew ANY of the information I gave in my post as I'm sure your sources of info are right wing websites and propaganda mills. I wouldn't be surprised if your entire first post was a cut and paste that you didn't give credit for.
Id still like to tell that to the judges that ruled on that. hehe
Originally posted by flyUnityThey would tell you exactly what No1 did as they actually know the facts.
OMG, I didnt know you would be so offended, I did not get this from a right wing website, although I did cut and paste this from an individual whos name I wont give out.
Id still like to tell that to the judges that ruled on that. hehe
Originally posted by no1marauderThe phrase "one Nation indivisible" had tremendous emotional meaning two decades after the end of the Civil War. This history, and the power of those words, were wrecked by the anti-communist addition to the pledge.
They didn't rule the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. They ruled that having public school children recite the Pledge with the words "under God" in it was unconstitutional. The Pledge is perfectly OK without the words "under God" which were, of course, added in 1953 about 50 years after the Pledge was written.
A judge doesn't hav ...[text shortened]... e chooses to. It's in the Constitution; I'll give you a cookie if you can find it on your own.
Join me in restoring the Pledge of Allegiance to its original beauty and power:
I Pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Originally posted by WulebgrOne Nation Indivisible.
The phrase "one Nation indivisible" had tremendous emotional meaning two decades after the end of the Civil War. This history, and the power of those words, were wrecked by the anti-communist addition to the pledge.
Join me in restoring the Pledge of Allegiance to its original beauty and power:
I Pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of ...[text shortened]... d to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
I need to get one of those stickers for my car.
Originally posted by telerionBrainy Dictionary
One Nation Indivisible.
I need to get one of those stickers for my car.
Indivisible
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not divisible; incapable of being divided, separated, or broken;
not separable into parts.
Well with God in the pledge being indivisible is a lie since people
are divided, without God being indivisible is a lie for the same reason.
Since we are seemly a country divided into our liberal or conservative
camps, or our God fearing, godless camps, I'd say it is a work in
progress no matter how you look at it. Since only a tolerant people,
those that really allow live and let live can be indivisible the clamor
alone on that pledge shows us we have fallen short of what our
forefathers had hoped for.
Kelly