Originally posted by twhiteheadI said God knows how He created the diversity of life. The Holy Bible
But you posted earlier:I would like to see evidence where the mutation or evolutionary process was helpful. Then I might have cause to reconsider the theory of evolution.
Suggesting you are interested in learning. Now you say you would rather remain ignorant.
says what He did, but not how he did it. It is probably to complicated
for man to understand and not that I don't want to learn. But I can't
explain how God made the diversity of life; I only know He did it from
the Biblical account. That makes the best sense to me.
Originally posted by RJHindsIt is probably to complicated for man to understand and not that I don't want to learn.
I said God knows how He created the diversity of life. The Holy Bible
says what He did, but not how he did it. It is probably to complicated
for man to understand and not that I don't want to learn. But I can't
explain how God made the diversity of life; I only know He did it from
the Biblical account. That makes the best sense to me.
We've worked it out, actually i should say Charles Darwin worked it out. Although other scientists such as Alfred Russel Wallace came to the same conclusions as Darwin at the same time, Darwin published his work first.
The diversification of life on this planet is explained by The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. 150 years of scientific research is contained in countless books which can be found in any good book store or library.
Now, do you REALLY want to learn, or are you just another closed minded liar?! I think know the answer to that one already.
Originally posted by Proper KnobWhat Charles Darwin explained in his book was adaptation by natural
[b]It is probably to complicated for man to understand and not that I don't want to learn.
We've worked it out, actually i should say Charles Darwin worked it out. Although other scientists such as Alfred Russel Wallace came to the same conclusions as Darwin at the same time, Darwin published his work first.
The diversification of life on this ...[text shortened]... arn, or are you just another closed minded liar?! I think know the answer to that one already.[/b]
selection which has nothing to do with the Theory of Evolution. He
only believed it might have something to do with evolution if it could
be determined that life has a common ancestor. What he failed to
consider is that God is the common Designer and Maker and this is
why there are common features in difference life forms.
Originally posted by RJHindsSo then Mr Evolutionary Biologist. Explain to me how natural selection has nothing to do with the 'Theory of Evolution'.
What Charles Darwin explained in his book was adaptation by natural
selection which has nothing to do with the Theory of Evolution. He
only believed it might have something to do with evolution if it could
be determined that life has a common ancestor. What he failed to
consider is that God is the common Designer and Maker and this is
why there are common features in difference life forms.
This should be a laugh.
Originally posted by Proper KnobMan had known about adaptation of animals and selective breeding for many
So then Mr Evolutionary Biologist. Explain to me how natural selection has nothing to do with the 'Theory of Evolution'.
This should be a laugh.
hundreds if not thousands of years before Darwin. Natural selection was
a way of explaining the same thing in the wild. No evolution at all.
Originally posted by RJHindsIs that your answer?! Good God!!! 🙄
Man had known about adaptation of animals and selective breeding for many
hundreds if not thousands of years before Darwin. Natural selection was
a way of explaining the same thing in the wild. No evolution at all.
Maybe you should write that up and send it off to be peer-reviewed?! I can see 150 years of evolutionary work crumbling after that cutting insight Ron.
Hilarious.
Originally posted by Proper Knobthe answer my friend, is blowing in the soup, the answer is blowing in the soup 🙂
Is that your answer?! Good God!!! 🙄
Maybe you should write that up and send it off to be peer-reviewed?! I can see 150 years of evolutionary work crumbling after that cutting insight Ron.
Hilarious.