Originally posted by PawnokeyholeSubjugation is an active, not passive, word. Definitions include "to make subservient" and "to force into submission". Subjugation does not just happen accidentally. You have to make it happen. Therefore, to claim that it could merely occur in passing makes no sense.
How do you know that the intended agenda is subjugation, and that the subjugation does not merely occur in passing, in pursuance of another agenda? The claim that subjugation is an agenda is far more substantial that the claim that it merely occurs; hence, it requires more substantial argument and evidence. Can you provide it?