Originally posted by josephw
"Always with the aggressive responses....." and yours aren't?
"Is it not true that the bible was written by men?" Men inspired by God.
"Is it not true that the OT of the bible Is a translation form an obscure language, which is easy to misinterpret?" Hebrew is obscure? Everything is easy to misinterpret!
"Is it not true that the KJV and all othe ...[text shortened]... s question. Would I know God's Word if I heard it or not? If so, why? If not, why?
There's no aggression in my responses... Simply questions, I only really get aggressive in response.... I honestly wanted to know which version of the bible you take literally and to know what you logic for choosing that version was given the circumstances of its writing and the amount of ears the story has been passed through....
"Men inspired by God". So its said, if I wrote a book today that was inspirational and a wonderful tale. Then said it was inspired by god, would you believe me?
No Hebrew isn't obscure, but its damn hard to translate, most words have multiple meanings depending on context...
"Everything is easy to misinterpret"... You make my point for me, your taking a book which is an interpretation literally.....
"Ask yourself this question. Would I know God's Word if I heard it or not? If so, why? If not, why?"
You see this is where logic and reasonable argument hit a wall. Just because you think its god's word and it makes sense to you. Doesn't make it gods word. A lot of Muslims believe the Quoran (spelling??) is the word of god. They contradict your word of god in places. Thus you can't both be right, but neither will admit they're wrong so logic fails to apply.
Personally I don't believe in a God, it doesn't make any sense to me. To me your god doesn't exist, therefore how could you know or not know his word... I've read the bible (KJV I believe), and various other religious texts, studying religions in general was part of my schooling until I was 17. Although it was thought by a Christian Chaplin it was still reasonably unbiased. None of them seemed like particularly divine words. So as you can see what seems like god's words to you, aren't god's words to everyone. And surely if these we're divine words we'd all clearly see them as such? No?, if God is selective about who he wants to see his words, and bases his judgment of those people on whether or not they see these words doesn't that make him/her slightly sadistic?