27 Apr '10 20:29>
Originally posted by daniel58I now understand your position on 10 commandments - I had not previously been aware of the 'murder' interpretation. My bad.
I do believe in the 10 commandments
Originally posted by daniel58You have a three part syllogism here in which the third statement does not follow of any necessity from the first two. Some people disagree that God is male. There are separate strands:
I don't think anybody would disagree that Jesus Is Male, and Jesus Is God, so therefore God Is Male we have to start with some premise
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI would never try to be engaged in an "edifying conversation" based on the claim "God Is Male". I would just reply with a limerick -an inappropriate one, sure thing😵
Really? This is what you would honestly stand by and describe as edifying conversation?
Check yourself.
Originally posted by black beetleTo be honest, it's a bit bewildering to hear such pettiness/puerility coming from you.
I would never try to be engaged in an "edifying conversation" based on the claim "God Is Male". I would just reply with a limerick -an inappropriate one, sure thing😵
Since my third limerick was removed "because this is a 13+ forum" as I was PMd by the Forum Moderator (I thanked him for that piece of information), I tried my best in order to post ano ...[text shortened]... ned two positions
From family phycisians
And ten more from the ol' parish priest.
😵
Originally posted by black beetleThe 'truth' that they'll never surrender
I would never try to be engaged in an "edifying conversation" based on the claim "God Is Male". I would just reply with a limerick -an inappropriate one, sure thing😵
Since my third limerick was removed "because this is a 13+ forum" as I was PMd by the Forum Moderator (I thanked him for that piece of information), I tried my best in order to post ano ned two positions
From family phycisians
And ten more from the ol' parish priest.
😵
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThe patronising claim "God Is Male" implies that whoever offers it knows for sure the gender of an entity whose existence remains in the realm of fantasy. Of course this homomorphic image of God reveals the depth of this approach -this is pettiness, and at the same time puerility because it promotes the delusional concept "God Is Male".
To be honest, it's a bit bewildering to hear such pettiness/puerility coming from you.
Moreover, that the image of God is conveyed to man in terms of a gender is certainly nothing new; neither can the significance of that gender be pushed aside as archaic oversight--- [b]He expresses Himself as male with purpose.
Ironically, the perversion ...[text shortened]... male authority figure, for that matter) is nearly the exact opposite of the original intention.[/b]
Originally posted by black beetleWell, you're nothing if not honest. Glad to know that you consider the Bible delusional: that helps put a barometer on the bullcrap factor for the rest of your manure-laden posts.
The patronising claim "God Is Male" implies that whoever offers it knows for sure the gender of an entity whose existence remains in the realm of fantasy. Of course this homomorphic image of God reveals the depth of this approach -this is pettiness, and at the same time puerility because it promotes the delusional concept "God Is Male".
Since this cl ...[text shortened]... reply, I consider that even a limerick is too much; however I 'm sorry I broke your heart😵
Originally posted by FreakyKBH"Well, of course you 'know' it. All it takes is a predisposition coupled with a sanctimonious arrogance to see the crap spewing forth from everyone but the man in the mirror."
Well, you're nothing if not honest. Glad to know that you consider the Bible delusional: that helps put a barometer on the bullcrap factor for the rest of your manure-laden posts.