27 Jul '15 18:55>
Originally posted by sonshipI don't believe a final and ultimate balancing happens. If I were to believe, I would probably be a universalist. I'd believe (or now hope I would believe) that everyone will be reunited in God. Eternal separation would not be just recompense for temporal existence in sin.
[b] I don't think about it in terms of objects. I believe we come to have moral duties by entering into associations with other moral agents and moral victims (entities that can suffer). Interconnections are made based on agreements to act according to agreed rules. According to the link I cited yesterday, we start with a reward/punishment moral theory (whic ...[text shortened]... timate power but the ultimate Authority to balance the moral scales according to [b]truth ?[/b]
The social contract recognizes the subjective nature of people's interests. However it is not the ultimate level of moral development, in Kohlberg's thinking, and there has been further development of the theories, since Kohlberg.