14 edits
@kellyjay saidMy stance is if you can do this to a fetus, you can do this to a two-year-old; they
My stance is if you can do this to a fetus, you can do this to a two-year-old; they
are both lives that matter. We differ if you think it is just to kill a two-year-old
because of something that happened to its mother.
are both lives that matter.
First off, I could care a less about your false, supposed Christian stance. Second, The two have nothing to do with each other in God's eyes; as the scripture I shared shows. simple as that.
We differ if you think it is just to kill a two-year-old
because of something that happened to its mother.
Who said it was just to kill a live, living two-year old? Now you are clearly falsely judging woman and girls who have an abortion due to rape, as murderers of live living two year old's. Better repent; or, you will be falsely judged as a murderer for every time you have masturbated, or used birth control, etc.
However, I will remind you that, God Himself killed King David's live and living new-born son for a rape that his father King David committed. A Rape and a cold blooded murder I recollect.
God has killed many many humans, including babies. God also had the Hebrews kill many people, including babies. That is if you believe the Bible for what it says.
Your stance is drowning from Biblical scriptures. Plugging your ears and covering your eyes will not help you on your judgment day for your false judging, and false Christian stance. All which is NO-where to be found in the Bible; Mr. Bible believing Christian man.
@kingdavid403 saidFalse stance, you think my view on ending any human life is false? Where is it acceptable to kill someone for the crimes of another? When God gives life God can take it away, do you or anyone you know give life, sustains it by their power outside of God?
My stance is if you can do this to a fetus, you can do this to a two-year-old; they
are both lives that matter.
First off, I could care a less about your false, supposed Christian stance. Second, The two have nothing to do with each other in God's eyes; as the scripture I shared shows. simple as that.
[b]We differ if you think it is just to kill a two-year- ...[text shortened]... hristian stance. All which is NO-where to be found in the Bible; Mr. Bible believing Christian man.
@kellyjay saidKing David gave 7 of Sauls sons to the Gibeonites to be hanged for the crimes of their father. One as to assume that it was ok with God as nothing was said to condemn that action, the way the murder and adultery committed by David was condemned.
False stance, you think my view on ending any human life is false? Where is it acceptable to kill someone for the crimes of another? When God gives life God can take it away, do you or anyone you know give life, sustains it by their power outside of God?
Then there was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year; and David enquired of the LORD. And the LORD answered, It is for Saul, and for his bloody house, because he slew the Gibeonites. And the king called the Gibeonites, and said unto them; (now the Gibeonites were not of the children of Israel, but of the remnant of the Amorites; and the children of Israel had sworn unto them: and Saul sought to slay them in his zeal to the children of Israel and Judah.) Wherefore David said unto the Gibeonites, What shall I do for you? and wherewith shall I make the atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the LORD? And the Gibeonites said unto him, We will have no silver nor gold of Saul, nor of his house; neither for us shalt thou kill any man in Israel. And he said, What ye shall say, that will I do for you. And they answered the king, The man that consumed us, and that devised against us that we should be destroyed from remaining in any of the coasts of Israel, Let seven men of his sons be delivered unto us, and we will hang them up unto the LORD in Gibeah of Saul, whom the LORD did choose. And the king said, I will give them. But the king spared Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan the son of Saul, because of the LORD'S oath that was between them, between David and Jonathan the son of Saul. But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite: And he delivered them into the hands of the Gibeonites, and they hanged them in the hill before the LORD: and they fell all seven together, and were put to death in the days of harvest, in the first days, in the beginning of barley harvest.(2 Samuel 21:1-9 KJV)
4 edits
@kellyjay saidAs I already told you, 'I could care a less about your false, supposed Christian stance.' An egg with a sperm-cell in it is not a life, baby, or person; it's an egg with a sperm-cell in it and nothing more; and, God clearly feels the same way about that. Hence, the scripture I previously shared. Now, stay on topic and answer my previous question; or, I'm done with your currently worthless lying arse.
False stance, you think my view on ending any human life is false? Where is it acceptable to kill someone for the crimes of another? When God gives life God can take it away, do you or anyone you know give life, sustains it by their power outside of God?
"Who said it was a just thing to murder a live and living two year-old baby?' Or, is that a lie all made up in your little brain?
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 29080
>> I get slated in here because I take what I feel is an eclectic view of biblical scripture.
Cherry picker.
>> Because I purposefully choose reject the what I see as being accounts of behaviour or direction (directly or indirectly) to behave in a morally reprehensible way.
Says Mr. Reprehensible.
>> I still internalise and focus on what I believe are the accounts of and direction towards behaving in a morally positive way
That's a larf.
>> This assertion that the only true Christian is a “bible believing Christian” is an anathema to me.
So egocentric.
>> I believe the bible.
Only parts of it.
>> I believe the parts which speak to me about me being a better person,
Um, sure.
>> those parts which speak about the positive relationship between creator and creation.
Why don't you work on positive relationships between you and everyone else?
>> I am therefore a “bible believing Christian”, am I not?
That's not the phrase I would use.
@kingdavid403 saidLife is life, at its start, middle, and through old age; that's true at any point, ending
As I already told you, 'I could care a less about your false, supposed Christian stance.' An egg with a sperm-cell in it is not a life, baby, or person; it's an egg with a sperm-cell in it and nothing more; and, God clearly feels the same way about that. Hence, the scripture I previously shared. Now, stay on topic and answer my previous question; or, I'm done with yo ...[text shortened]... to murder a live and living two year-old baby?' Or, is that a lie all made up in your little brain?
it ends that life. God alone has that right to end a life. He is the one that starts it for
His purposes, not ours; we are not our own, even our own lives all belong to God.
Everything in creation is His, the air we breathe all comes from Him, and life is
precious you think it is not, that there are stages of human life that don't matter,
a clump of cells, as if you too were not a clump of cells.
People attempt to make distinctions all the time on the ones they want to do away
with casting them into light that makes them worthy of the evil we want to do to
them because they either deserve it by our reckoning or are not worth living, and
you are making that judgment call on someone's life. Which is just as valuable in
the womb as out of it at any age.
1 edit
@kellyjay saidThis looks shockingly like the beam in your own eye.
False stance, you think my view on ending any human life is false? Where is it acceptable to kill someone for the crimes of another? When God gives life God can take it away, do you or anyone you know give life, sustains it by their power outside of God?