Originally posted by Dasa
So if they are curious to know of God, then they must go to the authority on God, and not be silly and try and find God by looking through their microscopes.
Because science believes they are the keepers of truth, they do not humble themselves to accept the authority of Vedanta on the subject of God.
If they reject this authority then they will only have ...[text shortened]... spiritual nature of this cosmos, and must submit to the authority for the spiritual.....Vedanta.
You obviously ignore all the content of my and other people's posts because I and others have already debunked (simply by pointing out the extremely obvious facts) all the crap here you have just repeated all over again:
“....So if they are curious to know of God, ...”
they are not. Science is not about being “ curious to know of God” .
“....then they must go to the authority on God,...”
there is no valid “authority on God” just as there is no valid “authority on the tooth fairy”
“.... and not be silly and try and find God by looking through their microscopes....”
nobody, including scientists, look for “ God by looking through their microscopes” 😛
“....Because science believes they are the keepers of truth, they do not humble themselves to accept the authority of Vedanta on the subject of God. ...”
no, if anything, we can say that “they 'humble' themselves by NOT believing they are “the keepers of truth” “.
“....If they reject this authority then they will only have their speculations, and this is not the scientific approach. ...”
No, if they reject religious dogma then that is implicitly one of the minimum requirements to the “scientific approach”.
“...Tell me....when the scientist wanted learn to mathematics, did he not submit to the lessons from the teacher without question.,...he simply accepted the authority of the mathematics book. ...”
the maths teacher and a maths book is usually correct most of the time and this can be VERIFIED just by checking the maths.
This contrasts with religious dogma that is not open to verification.
“...Since the spiritual cannot be contacted by material apparatus, they are at a loss to know anything of the spiritual nature of this cosmos, ...”
what “spiritual nature of this cosmos”? Where is the evidence for this? -there is none.