Originally posted by jaywill
[b]================================
Umm… It would from a Jewish point of view. Well, divinity, maybe—but distinguishable hypostasis (“personhood” ): not.
===================================
What do you mean "Jewish point of view"? Do you mean the Old Testament Jewish prophets did not speak of a personhood of the Spirit of God ?
Some of e Old Testament not only as possession but as apposition - ie. the Spirit is God.[/b]
I was not clear: there are, from a Jewish reading of the Hebrew Scriptures, no distinct
hypostases (distinct “personae” ) in the Godhead. There are not distinct
hypostases (“persons” ) of a single
ousia (being/essence/substance). God is both one
ousia and one
hypostasis. This is the case from both a mono
theistic Judaism and a nondualistic Judaism (and I am a nondualist).
I was not arguing the “personhood” of God (that would be a much more complex argument, one that separates monotheistic dualists from nondualists); I was just saying that there are no distinct persons in the godhead. And that is just what Trinitarianism has always asserted: that the
ousia of the godhead is composed of three distinct hypostases/persons, however the nature of that composition is otherwise described. The Torah/Tanach clearly uses personalistic language as applied to God; how could I deny that?!
But there is no multiplicity of hypostases/persons in the godhead. If it were otherwise, Jews would be avowed Trinitarians.