16 Nov '17 00:32>1 edit
Originally posted by @divegeesterThose aren't ad hominems. An ad-hominem is something like "Dive's claim is false because he is a cad and a bounder."
I’m not saying it’s off topic, I’m saying it’s not what my OP was about. When you put up a more engaging construct of your position which goes further than selective definitions, calling my position an “old chestnut” me as lacking understanding or any other type of lazy adhomien, then perhaps you will get some better responses. 😉
Meanwhile I am interested in my OP. Try starting a thread on altruism definitions and see how it goes.
Calling a viewpoint an "old chestnut" meant that I've heard it a few times before, and that is all I intended it to mean.
The point of quoting the definition was not to rule out nuance. It was to show that you were rejecting that a specific action was altruistic, even though "altruism" definition #1 fit it like a glove.