Originally posted by scottishinnzBe careful Scott - don't plaster all Christians with the excrement of Creationism. Standard Christian doctrine is more interested in Jesus and his divinity than with the omnipotence or otherwise of God.
It's just standard Christian doctorine. Please, tell me what you disagree with! Is God not omnipotent? Omnipresent? Omniscienct? Omnibenevolent? Does he not, according to standard Christian doctorine, make every soul unique?
1 edit
Originally posted by amannionSorry, I thought you were talking about Christians, so Christ's message would be appropriate. Now if you were talking about a battle over whether Edinborough's haggis tastes better then Glasgows, then the other's message might be correct.
Whose message - scott or jesus?
Originally posted by frogstompDepends more upon the individual butchery.
Sorry, I thought you were talking about Christians, so Christ's message would be appropriate. Now if you were talking about a battle over whether Edinborough's haggis tastes better then Glasgows, then the other's message might be correct.
Originally posted by scottishinnzOh I see so I don't even need to say something you just assume you
It's just standard Christian doctorine. Please, tell me what you disagree with! Is God not omnipotent? Omnipresent? Omniscienct? Omnibenevolent? Does he not, according to standard Christian doctorine, make every soul unique?
know what I believe.
I guess I don't need to respond you read minds or do whatever it is
you do to understand my position.
Is that your gift, God has his powers you have yours?
Kelly
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZDid you call me stupid bastard?
This thread is here because a number of posters in this forum need basic science education. The number of posts in this thread show that too.
EDIT: To/Too/Two you stupid bastard.
Easy to do over a few thousand miles with the Internet, isn't it?
I don't think the reason is that posters need a basic science education. I think the reason is the Evolution theory gives many people a sense of the answer to philosophical / spiritual questions about who they are and why they are here.
Evolution replaces God for many people. That's probably why you have 2000 some hits on the subject matter in the midst of a "Spirituality" Room on this Forum.
As for needing a basic science education. I wouldn't trust you to give one. Anyone who is so consceited at flagging on the Internet a simple typo "too" vs "to" vs "two" I would consider pretty hard up with self conceit about educating others.
I wouldn't trust a name calling brat like yourself qualified to give much proper education to his own kids let alone strangers.
Typical conceited high priest of Darwinist religion.
3 edits
Why did Evolutionists back away from Origin of Life arguments of science?
Probably because they saw it was a loosing battle for Darwinism.
As Francis Crick, Nobel Prize winner for the DNA model said:
"Every time I write a paper on the origin of life, I swear I will never write another one, because there is too much speculation running after two few facts"
1 edit
Originally posted by AgergI don't see the age of the universe is even much of an issue.
You're trying (like all other believers) to weasel your way out of a valid argument by questioning the accuracy of scientific observation whilst arguing the accuracy of your *faith*
It had a beginning. So we can assume that it had a Beginner.
It and life have a design so they had a Designer, however long ago the original creation was.
Young Earth or Old Earth doesn't matter to design detection.