29 Mar '06 08:57>
Originally posted by KellyJayYes I have. Of course you are now going to start a whole discusion on the meaning of 'witness'.
Let me ask you, have you witnessed major evolutionary change?
Has any major evolutionary change every been recorded anywhere,
outside of someone connecting dots on what they 'think' might
be the right way to look at fossils?
Yes they have. And in addition to that connecting the dots is what science is all about.
Has anyone seen in a lab or the wild anything outside of small changes within living systems?
Please make a definition of 'small changes' as the usual creationist game is to move such goal posts every time a proof is provided until the definition becomes something like this: A small change is anything that can be seen in the lab".
I believe you will see that the only thing supporting the belief system that is evolution, is how people connect the dots within the fossil record, which may or may not be true, when it comes to major changes in life.
I was not convinced of the validity of evolution by looking at the fosil record. I do not consider the fosil record to be essential to the Theory but it is certainly evidence of its validity. Predictions are made by the theory about what sort of fosils should be found and where (age/strata) they should be expected to be found and discoveries are then made which match these predictions. This is a hallmark of a good scientific Theory.
It is a belief, a matter of faith, it is not anything that can be shown as true to that degree only believed.
Kelly
Shown as true to what degree? Evolution is neither true nor false. It is a scientific Theory. Again I will say, you clearly do not understand what science is.
The only belief or faith involved in my case is my belief and faith that the scientific method is the best way to seek the answers to my questions about the universe.