Who Owns Truth Anyway ?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you certainly cannot claim that he is uninspired and when you do you will be called to provide a burden of proof for the claims is a truth claim.

There is no burden of proof on me stemming from your failure to prove your claim that the Bible is divinely inspired.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Good so we shall have no more claims that they are uninspired.

Who has claimed "they are uninspired"? Which of my posts are you referring to?

Originally posted by FMF
Who has claimed "they are uninspired"? Which of my posts are you referring to?

I don't know but whoever does cannot make the claim unless of course they have compelling reason. 😵

I have edited my text so as not to provide a pretext for your incessant whinging and pedantry. it now reads.

Good we shall have no claims that the Bible is uninspired.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I don't know but whoever does cannot make the claim unless of course they have compelling reason. 😵

I noticed you were attempting some kind of sophistry with the negative-meaning word "uninspired", but now it seems you are backing out as soon as you are asked point blank about it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Please see my admirable text above as it relates to Scots law and the verdict of not proven which illustrates your position brilliantly.

What does "Scots Law" have to do with anything?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Good we shall have no claims that the Bible is uninspired.

I'm pretty sure I - for example - haven't used the word "uninspired". Where did I use it? Quote me verbatim.

Originally posted by FMF
I noticed you were attempting some kind of sophistry with the negative-meaning word "uninspired", but now it seems you are backing out as soon as you are asked point blank about it.

sorry i have no idea what you are talking about nor have I any inclination to provide a vehicle for your incessant whinging and pedantry.

Originally posted by FMF
I'm pretty sure I - for example - haven't used the word "uninspired". Where did I use it? Quote me verbatim.

yawn. Perhaps someone else will engage your nitpicking

Originally posted by FMF
What does "Scots Law" have to do with anything?

double yawn. 😴 Is this really the best you can do? really? tone control, someone help FMF find it, he seems intent to scrimp around the bottom of the barrel.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yawn. Perhaps someone else will engage your nitpicking

If I assert, to you, that my posts here at RHP are divinely inspired, do you think this creates some sort of burden of proof for you?

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
Again you play to an audience with an argument that you know full well is pure bunkum.

He has tried to make similar "comedy" out of topics like marital rape and child sex abuse as well, so I don't really know who his "audience" is supposed to be. 😕

Originally posted by FMF
If I assert, to you, that my posts here at RHP are divinely inspired, do you think this creates some sort of burden of proof for you?

It creates a burden of proof for you to substantiate your claims of inspiration.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It creates a burden of proof for you to substantiate your claims of inspiration.

Well the burden of proof regarding your claim that the Bible is divinely inspired lies with you.

Originally posted by FMF
He has tried to make similar "comedy" out of topics like marital rape and child sex abuse as well, so I don't really know who his "audience" is supposed to be. 😕

wow it was only a matter of time before the old retrospective trollin elements up from the past routine was wheeled out for FMF to attempt some kind of moralizing routine. How predictable, how empty, how vacuous and how so utterly bereft.

Originally posted by FMF
Well the burden of proof regarding your claim that the Bible is divinely inspired lies with you.

yawn. someone help him please, its embarrassing now. 😴