@KellyJay saidGet back to me when someone digs up a cud-chewing lion jawbone fossil.
Science doesn’t refute it; it only identifies what is normal now. That is a good measure for some things, not all. If all the variables stay the same, normal would remain an absolute. What we see at the fall alters the calculus. A cosmic shift in normal took place in the fall. From that point on, animals started tearing each other apart, but not so when we all ate plants.
@moonbus saidAs I said, we are used to what is normal now; when the variables change, so do the outcomes. Have you ever seen the animal Kingdom without sin polluting all of life?
Get back to me when someone digs up a cud-chewing lion jawbone fossil.
Of course teeth have microadaptations. Large tusks or fangs may have served other purposes. Saber teeth eventually dropped out of contention in the circle of life, one reason supposing they were not as durable as they were sharp.
Science doesn't even begin to have all the studies done on these crocodile diets.