Go back
Why are Christians under attack ?

Why are Christians under attack ?

Spirituality


Originally posted by lemon lime
Why? You are already doing a fine job of torturing us for what seems like an eternity... so just keep on doing what you've been doing.
Is there a verse that supports RJHinds' assertion? I've never seen one. If you think there is, why not just point it out?


-Removed-
paranoia


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The oyster starts out with a grain of sand. It becomes an irritant to it and the oyster in an effort to salve over the irritant constructs a beautiful pearl eventually. πŸ˜€
Methinks we have irritated the irritants... good for us!


1 edit

-Removed-
Yes, why not? Its his perspective. You need not acquiesce to it, but he has the right to say it. Personally i don't believe it, but you seem to be confusing what he said with his right to say it.


Originally posted by lemon lime
paranoia
Paranoia? Not so. I think it was an ironic reference to Grampy Bobby saying that he and RJHinds should continue their chat about divegeester's 'deserving to go to Hell' in private [on page 14].


-Removed-
Once upon a time you appeared to be a very happy man....


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes, why not? Its his perspective. You need not acquiesce to it, but he has the right to say it.
Him having the "right" to claim it was not the question. You were asked if he was "right" to claim it. Do you think RJHinds' assertion is scriptural?

1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Personally i don't believe it, but you seem to be confusing what he said with his right to say it.
I think it is you who is confusing two different meanings of the word "right".

divegeester said "Do you believe RJHinds was right to tell me that I deserve to burn in hell for eternity, for not believing in the doctrine of eternal hell?"

He did not say "Do you believe RJHinds has the right to tell me that I deserve to burn in hell for eternity, for not believing in the doctrine of eternal hell?"


Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Paranoia? Not so. I think it was an ironic reference to Grampy Bobby saying that he and RJHinds should continue their chat about divegeester's 'deserving to go to Hell' in private [on page 14].
"Ron, thanks for your reply. Let's continue our conversation with personal messages and/or email. -Bob" He declined.


Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Once upon a time you appeared to be a very happy man....
This is a classic passive aggressive remark.


Originally posted by FMF
Him having the "right" to claim it was not the question. You were asked if he was "right" to claim it. Do you think RJHinds' assertion is scriptural?
Ok i understand now, its me who is confusing his right to say it rather than whether the content was right (accurate or correct I think would be better). As someone who does not profess belief in Hell as a literal place of torment I cannot say the content is accurate.



Originally posted by FMF
It's interesting how flustered some of the Christians here become - those who believe in the torturous fires of "Hell" - when they are called on to explain their concept or explain the differences between competing Christian concepts. I know you don't believe in "Hell" in the same way as RJHinds, sonship and Grampy Bobby do. sonship of course is well able and wi ...[text shortened]... trying to land little forum punches rather than talk about the matter in hand. It's fascinating.
yes but he is funny πŸ˜€

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.