Originally posted by sonhouseSome don't believe in the C-14 isotope, because it is used to establish timescales that disproves a young earth. And now they believe in a particle they like to call the 'god particle'. Why? Because it is as stable as god?
Well then, why not worship radio waves?
Originally posted by sonhouseTheir only other options were the "Darwin Particle" or the "sonhouse particle".
http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre7bc28h-us-higgs-god/
Only one scientist called it that and the media ran with it.
Sorry, it just does not have the same appeal. :'(
1 edit
Originally posted by JS357He is thinking about changing some other secular scientific terms as well. Here is a list.
And he's Jewish anyway; so the answer would be a question. 🙂
1. Jehova's selection
2. Davidic descent and modification.
3. Abrahamic inheritance of acquired characteristics
4. Solomons niches.
3 edits
Originally posted by FabianFnasIt does not really disprove a young earth because they apply it in the
Some don't believe in the C-14 isotope, because it is used to establish timescales that disproves a young earth. And now they believe in a particle they like to call the 'god particle'. Why? Because it is as stable as god?
wrong way because of their world view. They have insufficient
information and must make assumptions. To ASSUME makes an
ASS out of U and ME.
If they are applying C14 in the wrong way, then I agree with you. However they don't. Those who says otherwise are just afraid of the inplications or don't understand the C14-theory. Let's call the C14 isotope the 'Darwin particle' in the future.
Suppose the discovery of the Higgs particle, the so called god particle, can be used to prove the true age of the universe, then its very existance would be denied by YECs.