06 Nov '11 14:55>
Originally posted by SuzianneIf it isn't based in logic, reason, and evidence then it is not proof.
"refute them, no", or "refute them to my logical and evidence-based ideal of the way things should be, otherwise I'll reject it, no"?
Refutations have been given here, but the best some atheists can do is claim how stupid they sound because they have no basis in logic or proof.
I can defend my faith until the cows come home, but it is all just illogic ...[text shortened]... sts in the absence of proof. And that's illogical to you. And so we reach the impasse.
It is not that they sound stupid, its that they are stupid.
Faith proves nothing, as demonstrated by the multitude of contradictory
faiths of people around the world.
Blind faith (what you call true faith) is by definition illogical and idiotic.
If that is your basis for belief then you have no basis for belief.
That you assert with pride that your beliefs have absolutely no foundation
and pour scorn on those who refuse to believe based on absolutely no proof
is religions most dangerous aspect.
http://www.users.qwest.net/~jcosta3/article_dragon.htm