11 Oct '09 21:17>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDid you even bother to read my entire post? Paul's teachings make it quite clear that he viewed females as inferior to males. So far as I know, Jesus did not teach these things or anything like them. If you think He did, please post the passages. It does not logically follow that Jesus necessarily held the belief that females are inferior to males just because the 12 documented apostles were all male.
nope, its only problematic when you dont understand its implications. It is merely, as so much of Pauls writings are, procedural, for the sake of harmony within the structure of the congregation.
You will note that there were no females chosen as apostles, was Christ discriminating, let me here you say it thinkofone, was he, hardly. You will n ...[text shortened]... icly admit that Christ and the Apostles were also being discriminatory. let me here you say it.
nope, its only problematic when you dont understand its implications. It is merely, as so much of Pauls writings are, procedural, for the sake of harmony within the structure of the congregation.
Oh "procedural". Kind of like when it was common for blacks to have to ride in the back of the bus "for the sake of harmony". Or when blacks were not allowed to drink from the same public water fountains as whites "for the sake of harmony".