Originally posted by robbie carrobie but you suck them up into your mind, if there was no audience there would be no pornography, they exist because of you
Actually I would say that God has hardwired mans desires for women into their DNA. God is aware of what he did. Man cannot control that desire and if he could then the high population growth [which God wanted] would not exist. Certainly some men have more self control than others.
This is the reason in my opinion that Jesus did not go around condemning people for sexual offences which Im sure are petty when compared to more serious ones. Woman caught in adultery, another with several husbands. Christ said nothing to seriously condemn them but simply said to go and sin no more.
Pharisees whose offences were pride, lack of love for neighbours, misinterpreting the law .. etc, were more serious than peoples sexual desire.
Originally posted by Rajk999 Actually I would say that God has hardwired mans desires for women into their DNA. God is aware of what he did. Man cannot control that desire and if he could then the high population growth [which God wanted] would not exist. Certainly some men have more self control than others.
This is the reason in my opinion that Jesus did not go around condemning p ...[text shortened]... ve for neighbours, misinterpreting the law .. etc, were more serious than peoples sexual desire.
you cannot control your desires? wow what about Galations 5:22,23 Pornography is not about natural desires its about feeding the mind artificially and the degradation of women.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie you cannot control your desires? wow what about Galations 5:22,23 Pornography is not about natural desires its about feeding the mind artificially and the degradation of women.
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
(Galatians 5:22-23 KJV)
Originally posted by Rajk999 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
(Galatians 5:22-23 KJV)
What of it?
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
Originally posted by RBHILL It's a shame no one ever listen to that YouTube I posted on here about women in the Bible(church). It was about 10 minutes long.
is it how backward misogynistic churches are trying to reform how they perceive women?
Originally posted by robbie carrobie But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and [b]self-control. Against such things there is no law.[/b]
Self control is a desirable trait for sure. But where does one place it on a scale in relation to other more serious offences.
Originally posted by sonhouse What about that nice Leviticus verse that says a woman is worth 30 Sheckels and a man is worth 50? Sort of spells it out right there.
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/lev/27.html
I have seen you make this comment over and over, but it makes no sense. If you had to hire someone to work would you place the same value on their labour?
Originally posted by redbarons whoa my Zen Buddy lets not take this thread to seriously its only the ladies we are talking about most of them have more sense than to go all biblical on us imagine the pain and suffering if they ruled the roost one name sums it up THATCHER(spawn of satan)
Originally posted by Zahlanzi so your argument for why women should be second class is that a stupid myth from a book compiled by mysoginistic men from 1000 - 2000 years ago says they should be second class?
Why does it mean women should be second class to you? What class are children to you?
Originally posted by RJHinds Why does it mean women should be second class to you? What class are children to you?
i don't allow children to be leaders because they are not qualified to be. am i a bigot because i won't allow an IQ 60 person to handle my bank accounts?
are you saying not allowing a woman to teach in church is the same as not allowing a child to teach?
bottom line is: if you have a man and a woman both equally prepared to teach god's word or do any other task, and you always choose the man, you are mysoginistic and backwards.
Originally posted by Rajk999 I have seen you make this comment over and over, but it makes no sense. If you had to hire someone to work would you place the same value on their labour?
Because that verse puts it in stone and goes WAY beyond simple labor abilities.
They use verses like that to rationalize the degradation of women.
Look at all these religions that don't even allow women to be in the same room as men in a synagogue or church or Mosque?
You think that is just incidental? A frigging COINCIDENCE?
Originally posted by sonhouse Because that verse puts it in stone and goes WAY beyond simple labor abilities.
They use verses like that to rationalize the degradation of women.
Look at all these religions that don't even allow women to be in the same room as men in a synagogue or church or Mosque?
You think that is just incidental? A frigging COINCIDENCE?
Lev 27 places a rough value on all types of labour which the priests hire to live/work in the temple - men, women, children, babies, animals. The final value is up to the priests themselves if they prefer to change it.
Your claim that this is the root cause of all discrimination in the world against women is bull.
womens place in the eyes of god
14 May '14 15:421 edit
Back to Top