Bold National League Predictions

darvlay

Sports

27 Sep 07 13:17

PocketKings

Banned from edits

Grammar dyslexic

Joined: 20 May 05
Moves: 11372

02 Oct 07 19:29

Originally posted by darvlay
What a great game! Way better than the Pats rout of the Bengals. 🙂

The Rockies/Phillies series will be a great series to watch. The two teams will probably score 80 runs in the series.

Both stadiums are launching pads lol, should be interesting. The start times suck though

~~trevor33~~

my island

Joined: 10 Nov 05
Moves: 17944

02 Oct 07 22:05

Originally posted by Leaadas
Dont know the NL that well, the AL though...

Yankees/Indians Yanks in 4
Angels/Red Sox Angels in 7

Angels/Yankees Angels in 4

don't know baseball that well you mean.

angels/sox series is best of 5.

Leaadas

Joined: 03 Mar 07
Moves: 132846

03 Oct 07 05:18

Originally posted by trevor33
don't know baseball that well you mean.

angels/sox series is best of 5.

duh yeah... lol so Angels in 5 then lol

Maxwell Smart

Under Cover

Joined: 25 Feb 04
Moves: 28912

03 Oct 07 06:10

AL
Indians over Yankees in 5
Sox over Angels in 4
Sox over Indians in 7

NL
Doesn't matter, whoever wins this playoff will be cannon fodder in 4 for the winning AL team.

darvlay

Joined: 05 Jan 04
Moves: 45179

03 Oct 07 13:20

Originally posted by Maxwell Smart
AL
Indians over Yankees in 5
Sox over Angels in 4
Sox over Indians in 7

NL
Doesn't matter, whoever wins this playoff will be cannon fodder in 4 for the winning AL team.

Like last year when the Tigers were supposed to roll over the Cardinals?

PocketKings

Banned from edits

Grammar dyslexic

Joined: 20 May 05
Moves: 11372

03 Oct 07 15:39

Originally posted by Maxwell Smart
AL
Indians over Yankees in 5
Sox over Angels in 4
Sox over Indians in 7

NL
Doesn't matter, whoever wins this playoff will be cannon fodder in 4 for the winning AL team.

I pity your kind

shortcircuit

Fading Fast

A cemetary near you

Joined: 28 Jan 07
Moves: 106960

03 Oct 07 15:42

Originally posted by PocketKings
I pity your kind

he missed it by that ( ----------) much!

Maxwell Smart

Under Cover

Joined: 25 Feb 04
Moves: 28912

03 Oct 07 18:10

Originally posted by shortcircuit
he missed it by that ( ----------) much!

Maxwell Smart

Under Cover

Joined: 25 Feb 04
Moves: 28912

03 Oct 07 18:10

1 edit

Originally posted by Maxwell Smart

Although I wasn't surprised by these responses, this one was my clear favorite!

Edit- Not sure why this double posted, but I was referring to shortcircuit's response.