- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 22231
Originally posted by tomtom232He's going for the win... i picked the Ravens and NY so he picks the opposite in the hope that my picks are wrong. tbh after reading Manning's interview i'll be surprised if NY win.
I think NE will win but you really think they will cover the spread?
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 22231
1 edit
Originally posted by sh76Which is wrong... had the game finished 18-17 after 60 mins, NY would've covered, why punish them for taking it to overtime and losing? I would hope spread bets are paid out after 60 minutes, regardless of what happens in overtime. I'm not saying they are... i don't know, i'm saying they should be.
NY did end up winning, but a FG is 3 points. If SF had won (except on a safety), by definition they'd have covered.
Originally posted by Trev33You can have whatever opinion you like about whether they should be, but they're not.
Which is wrong... had the game finished 18-17 after 60 mins, NY would've covered, why punish them for taking it to overtime and losing? I would hope spread bets are paid out after 60 minutes, regardless of what happens in overtime. I'm not saying they are... i don't know, i'm saying they should be.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 22231
Originally posted by sh76Hypothetical scenario. Jets are playing the Steelers, Jets are +5.5 on the spread. The game is 17-14 in the Steelers favor but in the last kick of the game Jets get a field goal to force overtime. Steelers score a TD in overtime and win 23-17. On what planet did the Jets not cover the spread? They miss the field goal attempt, they cover the spread, they make it and don't?
You can have whatever opinion you like about whether they should be, but they're not.